38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Contempt Notice Served to Adv. Prashant Bhushan and Twitter India for Tweets against the Judiciary

By Harshil Jain      25 July, 2020 12:20 PM      0 Comments
Contempt Notice Served Prashant Bhushan Twitter India

On Wednesday, 22 July 2020, Advocate Prashant Bhushan along with Twitter India was served with contempt notice regarding tweets against the judiciary. The Supreme Court issued a notice to Prashant Bhushan seeking his response as to why any action should not be taken against him for such comments on Judiciary. 

Twitter India was questioned as to why they did not remove Prashant Bhushans tweets when they were involving controversy and a contempt action was already been instituted against it. 

Twitter India said that they will convey this message to their parent company Twitter Inc. based in California. The Supreme Court took up contempt proceedings on its own against Mr. Bhushan for two tweets

In June month of this year, Mr. Bhushan alleged the judiciary had a hand in dealing with damage to democracy. On 27 June 2020, Prashant Bhushan accused the Supreme Court of playing a part in the "destruction of India's democracy" in the last six years. 

He tweeted, When historians in the future look back at the last 6 years to see how democracy has been destroyed in India even without a formal Emergency, they will particularly mark the role of the Supreme Court in this destruction, and more particularly the role of the last four CJIs.

The Supreme Court requested the Attorney General to support the court in this case, acknowledging that Twitter Inc, headquartered in California, is the correct party to this case, not Twitter India. 

The Three-Judge Bench consisting of Justice Arun Mishra, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Krishna Murari then allowed the social media firm to file a petition that they found appropriate for the matter. 

His second tweet, on 29 June 2020, Prashant Bhushan posted a photograph of Chief Justice of India Sharad Arvind  Bobde sitting on a Harley Davidson motorcycle in Pune along with the text CJI rides a 50 Lakh motorcycle belonging to a BJP leader at Raj Bhavan Nagpur, without a mask or helmet, at a time when he keeps the SC in Lockdown mode denying citizens their fundamental right to access justice! 

The Supreme Court contended that A petition was presented before us for contempt proceeding on the administrative side. We have gone through the petition and the allegation against CJI SA Bobde. The tweet in question was tweeted on June 27... We issue a notice to the Attorney General. We also note that the correct party here is Twitter Inc of California and not Twitter India. Twitter permitted to file an appropriate application.

A contempt case registered in 2009 against Prashant Bhushan and Tarun Tejpal, who is a former editor of Tehelka magazine, is also listed before the same bench to be heard on Friday, 24 July 2020. The case relates to certain comments made by Bhushan in an interview to Tehelka magazine against former Chief Justice of India S H Kapadia. 

Prashan Bhushan is a public interest lawyer in the Supreme Court of India. He was a member of India Against Corruption (IAC) movement known as Team Anna, which supported Anna Hazare 's campaign to implement the Jan Lokpal Act. After a split in the IAC, he helped Team Anna to form the Aam Aadmi Party. 

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM
intra-court-appeal-maintainable-against-ex-parte-ad-interim-orders-affecting-statutory-remedy-rights-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Intra-Court Appeal Maintainable Against Ex Parte Ad Interim Orders Affecting Statutory Remedy Rights: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules intra-court appeals are maintainable against ex parte ad interim orders that affect a party’s right to pursue statutory remedies.

06 March, 2026 04:59 PM
i-was-stalked-in-the-early-days-of-my-practice-justice-savitri-ratho-recalls-experience-at-iwil-national-conference
Trending Legal Insiders
“I Was Stalked in the Early Days of My Practice”: Justice Savitri Ratho Recalls Experience at IWIL National Conference

Justice Savitri Ratho recalls being stalked during her early legal career at the IWIL National Conference, highlighting challenges faced by women in the profession.

09 March, 2026 06:21 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email