38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

70-Year- Old Solicitor Granted Bail by Mumbai Court in Public Servant Assault Case; Counsel argues that the attack was other way round

By Shilpa Mathew      29 March, 2022 10:48 PM      0 Comments
Mumbai Court in Public Servant Assault Case

A Solicitor, named Ashwini Kumar Shah, holding an experience of over 30 years as a Bombay High Court lawyer, was arrested on 24th March and had been in custody. On 28th March 2022, the 70-year-old Solicitor Advocate was granted bail by the Mumbai Court. The advocate was accused of causing hurt as well as obstructing an officer of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation.  He was thus charged under Sections 332 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for voluntarily causing hurt and obstructing the duty of the BMC officer.

The Additional Sessions Judge MA Bhosale directed that Kumar be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of 25,000. 

Some officers of the BMC had come to the premises owned by Kumar's wife, for attaching properties towards the non-payment of property tax under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888, on 23rd March 2022.

Ashwini Kumar Shah was arrested on the intervening night between the 23rd March and 24th March, 2022. Kumar was remanded to judicial custody by the Metropolitan Magistrate at Ballard Pier, Mumbai on 24th March 2022, after which he moved for bail.

The Counsel for Kumar, Aniket Nikam, had argued that despite showing all legitimate documents to the BMC officers, they mocked him before his fellow colleagues. 

Advocate Nikam also argued that the officers of BMC assaulted Kumar and it was not the other way round. It was also submitted that no recovery is to be made from Kumar and therefore there is no good reason to keep him behind the bars.

The Bail plea was opposed by the prosecution and also stated that granting bail to Kumar would set a highly wrong example and that leniency could not be granted to Kumar only because he is a senior citizen. They also argued that if Kumar is granted bail, he might tamper with the evidence or witnesses. After hearing both parties the Court proceeded to allow the bail plea.

Case title: Ashwini Kumar Shah Vs State of Maharashtra.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email