38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Civil suit filed in Delhi Court seeking restoration of Complex comprising of 27 temples located within Qutub Minar Complex

By Dev Kumar Patel      11 December, 2020 11:32 AM      0 Comments
Qutub Minar Civil suit Delhi Court

A civil suit has been filed in the South Saket Court, New Delhi seeking restoration of 27 Hindu and Jain temples with respective deities.

Further the suits seeks for issuance of direction to Central Government to frame scheme of administration and create a Trust to manage the Puja, Worship, Maintenance of the property and carry out necessary work in accordance with the provisions contained in sections 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 of The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

Section 14 of the  Act permits the Central Government to maintain the protected monument. 

Section 16 of the Act permits to continue worship of the religion which may be in consonance with the character of the building.

Section 17 of the Act provides for relinquishment of Government rights in the Monument

Section 18 of the Act provides that the public shall have a right of access to any protected monument. 70. 

That Section 19 of the Act provides that construction can be raised within the area protected monument only on the permission of the Central Government.

The subject matter of the present suit is as follows:

  • A huge temple complex which later on came to know as Quwwat-Ul-Islam Mosque situated at Mehrauli within the area of Tehsil / Sub Division Hauz Khas Police Station Mehrauli, District South Delhi.
  • The Government of India vide notification No. DL, 387-Edu, dated 16.01.1914 declared the building as Protected Monument in exercise of the powers under section 3 of Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904.

From scheme of the Act it is clear that Central Government is under legal obligation to protect an ancient and historical monument. At the same time there is provision that worship within the monument in accordance with the religious character of the building may be performed and repair works can also be carried out according to need and the public has right to enter in the premises fulfilling the conditions which may be provided in rules.

As this suit is related to the Central Government it is a mandatory provision under Section 80 of Civil Procedure Code, 1909, to sent a legal notice two months before filing any civil suit against Central Government

As per the provision notice has been sent before filing of civil suit wherein in rely it was stated that there is no provision to hand over the possession of the CPM to any Trust or else in the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act,1958.

The suit specifically states that the present suit is to preserve and protect the religious and cultural heritage of India, and to exercise the right to religion guaranteed by Article 25 and 26 of Constitution of India which were dismantled, desecrated and damaged under the command and orders of Qutub-Din-Aibak.

The Petitioners were represented by Supreme Court Advocate Vishnu S. Jain before Civil Judge Neha Sharma, who fixed the next date of hearing on December 24, 2020.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email