38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Rohini Court Shootout: Delhi Court Remands Accused to 2 Days in Police Custody for Allegedly Being Involved in Criminal Conspiracy to Kill Jitender Jogi

By Tamanna      06 October, 2021 01:55 PM      0 Comments
Rohini Court Shootout

On Tuesday ( October 5, 2021), a Delhi Court remanded accused Naveen Dabas in police custody for two days for allegedly being involved in a criminal conspiracy to kill Jitender Jogi in a recent shootout in Rohini Court. 

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Satvir Singh Lamba stated that because the material and relevant aspects of the alleged conspiracy and the identity of the suspects are unknown, a police remand is required.

The court stated that, Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as keeping in view the nature of offence, application moved on behalf of IO is allowed in the interest of justice for proper and fair investigation to unearth the entire conspiracy as well as to bring true and real facts of the case on record. Accordingly, the accused Naveen Dabas@ Balli is sent/remanded to police custody for 2 days subject to his medical examination as per rules.

The prosecution claimed that on the orders of Naveen Dabas Balli, one of his associates, Naveen Hooda Bhanja, brought one "Nepali," who had arrived at Rohini Court dressed as an advocate and armed, to join the other assailants in order to murder Jitender Gogi.

It was thus submitted that interrogation in custody was necessary to unearth a deep-seated conspiracy as well as to identify and arrest the co-accused persons in the case.

Advocate Nitin Vashist represented the accused, while APP Sharawan Kumar Bishnoi represented the State. 

The allegations in the case are that inside Rohini Court Room No. 207, where Jitender Maan Gogi was brought for a physical hearing, two assailants, Rahul Tyagi and Jaideep, shot him dead.

The assailants were apprehended by the vigilant Delhi Police Force, and a FIR was filed under Sections 186, 353, 302, 120B, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, as well as sections 25, 27, 54, and 59 of the Arms Act, 1959.

When Gogi was brought into the courtroom, the assailants dressed as lawyers attacked him. Witnesses told the media that the judge and court personnel were present when the horrific incident occurred. Images have emerged of litigants and lawyers fleeing for safety in the midst of the shootout. 

The Delhi High Court's bench led by the Chief Justice recently took suo moto cognizance of the gun firing incident.

Earlier, in the aftermath of the firing incident, Justice Rekha Palli issued a notice on a petition seeking directions on Delhi Police and the Delhi Bar Council to take measures to ensure the safety and security of Delhi District Courts.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email