38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 05, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

TRP Scam Case- Republic TVs CFO Approaches SC regarding Summons Issued Against Him by Mumbai Police

By VANDANA KOTHARI      12 October, 2020 06:35 PM      0 Comments
TRP Scam Case Republic Supreme Court

Recently on 8th October 2020, Mumbai police in a press conference said that it has busted a "TRP scam", Television Rating Points (TRPs) were being manipulated. In the briefing, the Mumbai Police Commissioner Param Bir Singh said that ratings by the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC), an organization under the Ministry of Information and Broadcast (I&B), which measures television ratings in India, has been manipulated.

Republic TV and two other Marathi channels were named by the police and in connection with the matter, four people were arrested. The police had summoned the CFO of Republic TV- S. Sundaram since they believe he is "acquainted with certain facts and circumstances of the matter.

After he was summoned, he approached the Supreme court with a petition regarding the summons and wrote to Mumbai police that he had filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court and requested them to not proceed with the investigation till this was heard.

"We will join the investigations subject to the orders of the Supreme Court. I would also like to inform you that on account of some personal commitments, I am scheduled to travel outside Mumbai for the next few days and accordingly will only be available in Mumbai by 14-15 October 2020," S Sundaram, Republic TV's CFO wrote on Saturday, 10 October.

Arnab Goswami, head of Republic TV gave a statement that reads "Commissioner made false allegations against Republic TV because we have questioned him in the Sushant Singh Rajput case investigation. Republic TV will file a criminal defamation case against Mumbai Police commissioner Param Bir Singh.

When the copy of the FIR was received by the channel it was revealed that in the original FIR, Republic TV did not find a mention anywhere. In fact, it was India Today that had been named in the original FIR. ACP Mr. Shashank Sandbhor is investigating and the FIR was registered under section 409 ( Criminal breach of trust by a Public Servant or by Banker, Merchant or an Agent), 420 (Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 120B (Punishment of criminal conspiracy), 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) of IPC.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

rouse-avenue-court-discharges-arvind-kejriwal-manish-sisodia-and-21-others-in-delhi-excise-policy-case-slams-cbi-for-lack-of-evidence
Trending Executive
Rouse Avenue Court Discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 Others in Delhi Excise Policy Case; Slams CBI for Lack of Evidence

Rouse Avenue Court discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 others in Delhi Excise Policy case, citing lack of evidence.

27 February, 2026 12:29 PM
sc-imposes-blanket-ban-on-ncert-class-8-social-science-book-over-corruption-in-judiciary-chapter-issues-contempt-notices
Trending Judiciary
SC Imposes Blanket Ban on NCERT Class 8 Social Science Book Over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ Chapter, Issues Contempt Notices [Read Order]

Supreme Court bans NCERT Class 8 textbook over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ chapter, issues contempt notices and orders nationwide seizure.

27 February, 2026 01:00 PM
sc-holds-limitation-in-drugs-and-cosmetics-act-prosecution-begins-when-identity-of-accused-is-known-not-from-date-of-complaint
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Limitation in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Prosecution Begins When Identity of Accused Is Known, Not From Date of Complaint [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules limitation in Drugs Act cases begins when identity of accused is known, not from first complaint; Section 202 CrPC not mandatory for public servants.

27 February, 2026 01:30 PM
maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email