38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Warrant Issued By Probe Panel Against Former Police Commissioner Of Mumbai

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      13 September, 2021 02:39 PM      0 Comments
Warrant Issued By Probe Panel Against Former Police Commissioner Of Mumbai

On 6th September 2021, the inquiry commission, headed by the Bombay High Court judge, Justice Kailas Uttamchand Chandiwal,  issued a bailable warrant against the Ex- Mumbai Police commissioner Param Bir Singh as a consequence of him not appearing physically before the panel for the investigation.

BACKGROUND 

The Government of Maharashtra had formed this one-member commission to look into the allegations made by the ex-police commissioner against the former Home Minister, Mr. Anil Deshmukh stating that he was responsible for putting the police officers in Mumbai to the task of collecting money from different bars and restaurant owners.

DUTY OF THE COMMISSION 

A time period of six months was provided to the commission to submit the reports in this case. It was responsible for establishing that whether the anti-corruption bureau of the state needed to investigate the allegations. 

Furthermore, if the evidence submitted by the ex-cop was enough for levelling such allegations along with if there were any misconducts that were done by the staff members of the accused. Lastly, the commission was also supposed to provide any suggestions which they believed could help in the investigation.

ARGUMENTS OF THE EX-POLICE COMMISSIONER OF MUMBAI

Param Bir Singh appealed to the Bombay High Court for removing the commission and he justified this by stating that the Supreme Court, as well as the High Court, had asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct an investigation into the allegations and therefore there is no need for this commission.

ACTIONS TAKEN BY COMMISSION 

The commission issued various summons to the ex-police commissioner, however, he failed to appear in person and therefore as a consequence the commission imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000 on him in June and the last month two fines of INR 25,000 was levied against the officer.

There have been four first Information Reports filed against Singh, two of them have been filed in Mumbai and the other two have been filed in Thane. The fourth F.I.R was filed on 21st August 2021.

PRESENT SCENARIO

A lookout notice has been issued against the Ex-police commissioner so that he cannot go to another country. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email