38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, May 26, 2024
Crime, Police And Law

Woman Gets Rs. 70,000 From Match Making Website For Failing To Find A Man Of Her Choice [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      04 October, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Woman Gets Rs. 70,000 From Match Making Website For Failing To Find A Man Of Her Choice [Read Judgment]

A District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in Chandigarh has recently ordered a matchmaking website to refund the amount paid by a woman along with Rs. 7,000 as compensation and Rs. 5,000 as litigation costs for failing to find a man of her choice.

A 27-year-old woman residing in Sector 27 Chandigarh, had paid Rs. 58,650 to Wedding Wish Pvt. Ltd. a matchmaking web portal in Sector 36 Chandigarh for finding her a suitable match. She had signed up by paying Rs. 58,650 for a 12-month ‘royal’ plan. About 21 profiles of potential partners had to be sent to her account and meetings and conferences arranged by the company with the ones she had selected.

However, failing to recommend any suitable men, the woman filed a consumer complaint on June 2, 2016, alleging that the proposed matches were “meaningless,” and not up to her expectations.

The woman in her complaint said that even though the company had been asked repeatedly to recommend suitable men to her, it did not do so, the complainant said.

A legal notice was sent to the website on July 30, 2016.

The company on its part claimed that the customer herself had terminated the deal and that though they were bound to provide 21 profiles, they had sent 37 to her as a “goodwill gesture”.

Moreover, the company also claimed that the work on profiles in which the woman had shown interest was continuing, however, in August 2016 she started rejecting the meetings and conference calls and stopped taking calls from its executives.

The consumer forum observed that merely by attaching details of various phone call recordings between the complainant and the firm did not mean that the demands of its client had been fulfilled. “In the absence of suitable profiles, it was not possible for the complainant to estimate the suitability of the proposed boys for matrimonial purposes,” added the judgment.

If complete details of the potential matches had been sent to its client, things could have turned out differently, the forum observed slapping the penalty on Wedding Wish Pvt. Ltd.

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [May 20 - May 25]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

26 May, 2024 11:25 AM


Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea for stay on new criminal laws

SC refuses plea to stay new criminal laws. Court deems the plea casual, noting laws aren't yet implemented. Petitioner withdraws. Laws effective from July 1, 2024.

20 May, 2024 12:58 PM
Trending Know The Law
SCBA Election Result 2024, Know the newly elected members

SCBA Election Result 2024: Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal elected President. Know the newly elected members and key office bearers leading the Supreme Court Bar Association.

20 May, 2024 03:03 PM
Trending Judiciary
Cannot Allow the Game of Hide and Seek for Committing Murder of an Unborn Child: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court denies abortion for minor rape victim, condemns misuse of legal authority to terminate pregnancy and prevent justice.

20 May, 2024 03:52 PM
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Hit & Run: Bail Granted to 17 Year Old in Under 14 Hours, Asked to write essay

Bail granted to 17-year-old in Pune Porsche hit-and-run case within 14 hours. Conditions include educational tasks, supervision, and counseling. Incident killed two.

20 May, 2024 04:30 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email