38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

'Can't projects judges as political actors,' ex CJIs, former judges rebut statement by ex judges on statement of Amit Shah [Read Statement]

By Jhanak Sharma      27 August, 2025 06:46 PM      0 Comments
Cant projects judges as political actors ex CJIs former judges rebut statement by ex judges on statement of Amit Shah

NEW DELHI: A group of 56 judges including two former Chief Justices of India P Sathasivam and Ranjan Gogoi on Tuesday rebutted a statement of a few former judges, who sought to call out Union Home Minister Amit Shah for "misinterpretation" of a judgment in Salwa Judum case delivered by opposition candidate to Vice President post, Justice B Sudarshan Reddy in his stint as a judge.

"We, as former judges of this country, feel compelled to place on record our strong disagreement with the recent statement issued by a group of retired judges and activists," they said in a statement.

They pointed out it has become a predictable pattern, wherein every major political development is met with statements from the same quarters.

"These statements are determined to cloak their political partisanship under the language of judicial independence. This practice does a great disservice to the institution we once served, as it projects judges as political actors," they said.

Maintaining that this erodes the prosperity, dignity and neutrality that the office of a judicial officer demands, they pointed out, a fellow retired judge has chosen, of his own volition, to contest the election for the office of the Vice President of India.

"By doing so, he has stepped into the political arena as a candidate supported by the opposition. Having made that choice, he must defend his candidacy like any other contestant, in the realm of political debate," they said.

To suggest otherwise is to stifle democratic discourse and to misuse the cover of judicial independence for political convenience. Judicial independence is not threatened by the criticism of a political candidate, they added.

"What truly tarnishes the reputation of the judiciary is when former judges repeatedly issue partisan statements, giving the impression that the institution itself is aligned with political battles. As a result of these tactics, because of the fault of a few, the larger body of judges ends up being painted as partisan coterie," they said.

The former judges said, this is neither fair nor healthy for India’s judiciary or democracy.

"We therefore strongly call upon our brother judges to desist from lending their names to politically motivated statements. Let those who have chosen the path of politics defend themselves in that realm. The institution of the judiciary must be kept above and distinct from such entanglements," they said.

Among those who issued the statement are, Justice A K Sikri and Justice M R Shah, former Judges, Supreme Court, and former Chief Justice of MP HC, Justice Suresh Kait, ex CJ of J& K HC Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, former Chief Justice, Kerala High Court, Navniti P Singh, former CJ of Rajasthan Hac Justice SK Mittal, Former Chief justice Patna High Court Justice L Narsimha Reddy.

[Read Statement]

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-criticises-mp-high-court-for-granting-release-via-habeas-corpus-says-order-shocks-the-conscience
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticises MP High Court for Granting Release via Habeas Corpus, Says Order “Shocks the Conscience” [Read Order]

SC sets aside MP High Court order releasing an accused via habeas corpus, calling the approach impermissible and a misuse of bail jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 10:20 AM
family-members-undertaking-cannot-replace-bail-conditions-sins-of-accused-cannot-be-visited-on-relatives-sc
Trending Judiciary
Family Member’s Undertaking Cannot Replace Bail Conditions, ‘Sins of Accused Cannot Be Visited On Relatives’: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside bail in 731 kg ganja case, ruling that a family member’s undertaking cannot substitute mandatory conditions under the NDPS Act.

17 November, 2025 10:33 AM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-declares-transgender-rights-act-a-special-law-orders-board-to-amend-educational-records
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Declares Transgender Rights Act a Special Law, Orders Board to Amend Educational Records [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules Transgender Rights Act, 2019 as special law; directs education board to update transgender man’s name and gender in records.

12 November, 2025 11:00 AM
sc-grants-statutory-status-to-delhi-ridge-management-board-to-safeguard-delhis-green-lungs
Trending Judiciary
SC Grants Statutory Status to Delhi Ridge Management Board to Safeguard Delhi’s “Green Lungs” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court directs statutory status for Delhi Ridge Management Board, calling the Ridge Delhi’s “green lungs” vital to combat rising air pollution.

12 November, 2025 11:15 AM
arbitration-agreement-valid-without-signatures-if-consensus-evident-from-conduct-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Arbitration Agreement Valid Without Signatures if Consensus Evident from Conduct: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Arbitration agreement valid even without signatures if parties’ conduct shows intent to arbitrate, rules Kerala High Court in Sigmatic Nidhi Ltd v. Suresh Kumar.

12 November, 2025 11:29 AM
madras-hc-refers-questions-of-caste-certificate-verification-after-retirement-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Refers Questions Of Caste Certificate Verification After Retirement To Larger Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers issue of caste certificate verification after retirement to larger bench amid conflicting rulings on post-retirement inquiries.

12 November, 2025 11:39 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email