38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

In computing period of of limitation for any suit, the period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021 shall stand excluded: Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks reiterates SC order via public notice [READ NOTICE]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      12 October, 2021 07:46 PM      0 Comments
 In computing period of of limitation for any suit, the period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021 shall stand excluded: Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks reiterates SC order via public notice [READ NOTICE]

The Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks for the Office of CGPDTM, Mumbai, recently observed via public notice the Supreme Courts order regarding the computation of the period of limitation for suits which stated that in computing period of limitation for any suit, the period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021 shall stand excluded.

The Apex Court had previously extended the period of limitation prescribed under the general law or special laws with effect from 15 March 2020 till further orders. However, it later made specific observations and noted that only the period from 15 March 2020 till 2 October 2021 shall stand excluded and consequently, the balance period of limitation remaining as on 15.03.2021, if any, shall become available with effect from 03.10.2021.

The above observations were made while hearing an application by the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association (SCAORA) demanding for the dated 23 March 2020 to be restored. An order to that effect was passed 23 September 2021.

Background:

The Apex Court, in the matter of Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 had previously extended the period of limitation prescribed under the general law or special laws with effect from 15 March 2020 via an order dated 23 March 2020. 

Keeping in mind the situation arising on account of Covid-19 and the resultant difficulties that may be faced by litigants across the country in filing their petitions and suits within the period of limitation the court had noted that a period of limitation in all such proceedings shall stand extended w.e.f. 15 March 2020 till further order/s to be passed by it. 

The stand was however, modified by the Supreme Court via its order dated 8 March 2021 which stated:

In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from 15 March 2020 till 14 March 2021 shall stand excluded. Consequently, the balance period of limitation remaining as on 15.03.2020, if any, shall become available with effect from 15 March 2021.

The Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association (SCAORA) however intervened in the Suo Motu proceedings by filing Miscellaneous Application No.665 of 2021 seeking restoration of the order dated 23 March 2020.

However, the court rejected the application by stating the follows: The order dated 23 March 2020 was passed in view of the extraordinary health crisis. On 08 March 2021, the order dated 23 March 2020 was brought to an end, permitting the relaxation of period of limitation between 15 March 2020 and 14 March 2021. While doing so, it was made clear that the period of limitation would start from 15.03.2021. As the said order dated 8 March 2021 was only a one-time measure, in view of the pandemic, we are not inclined to modify the conditions contained in the order dated 8 March 2021.

Courts Observations:

In dismissing the application for seeking restoration of the order dated 23 March 2020, the Court noted, the following: 

  1. In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from 15 March 2020 till 02 October 2021 shall stand excluded. Consequently, the balance period of limitation remaining as on 15 March 2020, if any, shall become available with effect from 03 October 2021.
  2. In cases where the limitation would have expired during the period between 15 March 2020 till 02 October 2021, notwithstanding the actual balance period of limitation remaining, all persons shall have a limitation period of 90 days from 03 October 2021. In the event the actual balance period of limitation remaining, with effect from 03 October 2021, is greater than 90 days, that longer period shall apply.
  3. The period from 15 March 2020 till 02 October 2021 shall also stand excluded in computing the periods prescribed under Sections 23 (4) and 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings.

It is accordingly notified to all the stakeholders that period of limitation shall be computed in accordance with the afore-cited order dated 23 September 2021 passed by the Honble Supreme Court of India, it was further noted by the Office of CGPDTM, Mumbai Govt. of India via its public notice.

 

 [READ NOTICE]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

words-spreads-faster-than-winds-sc-relies-on-testimony-of-neighbour-acquits-woman-in-dowry-harassment-case
Trending Judiciary
'Words spreads faster than winds,' SC relies on testimony of neighbour; acquits woman in dowry harassment case [Read Judgment]

SC acquits woman in dowry case, citing neighbour’s testimony: “Word spreads faster than wind” — conviction under Section 498A set aside.

30 August, 2025 05:54 PM
sc-refuses-to-entertain-plea-against-use-of-temples-land-funds-for-building-college-in-chennai
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses to entertain plea against use of temples' land, funds for building college in Chennai

SC refuses plea against use of Chennai temples’ land, ₹25 cr funds for building college, says using temple assets for education not improper.

30 August, 2025 06:01 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM
18-former-judges-write-to-union-home-minister-amit-shah-criticizing-his-remarks-on-justice-b-sudershan-reddy
Trending Judiciary
18 Former Judges write to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy

18 ex-judges write to Union HM Amit Shah, criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy, stressing judicial independence and dignity.

25 August, 2025 03:09 PM
sc-stays-investigation-into-firs-against-csds-co-director-sanjay-kumar
Trending Judiciary
SC stays investigation into FIRs against CSDS co director Sanjay Kumar

SC stays probe into FIRs against CSDS co-director Sanjay Kumar over Maharashtra polling data post; says multiple cases show harassment motive.

25 August, 2025 03:14 PM
influencers-indulging-in-commercial-speech-cant-claim-fundamental-right-sc
Trending CelebStreet
Influencers indulging in commercial speech can't claim fundamental right: SC

SC: Influencers making commercial speech can’t claim fundamental rights; must apologize and act responsibly towards community sensitivities.

25 August, 2025 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email