38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

External Affairs Minister Files Caveat In SC Over Plea Challenging His Election To The Rajya Sabha

By LawStreet News Network      12 February, 2020 05:02 PM      0 Comments
External Affairs Minister Files Caveat In SC Over Plea Challenging His Election To The Rajya Sabha

On the 12th of February, 2020, the External Affairs Ministers - S Jaishankar filed a caveat in the Supreme Court. The caveat will be heard only if the Supreme Court decides to take up petitions that were filed by the Congress party leaders namely Gaurav Pandya, Chandrika Chudsama and Paresh Dhanani that had challenged his and BJP leader Jugali Thakor's election to the Upper House of the Parliament, Rajya Sabha from Gujarat in July 2019. The elections to the two Rajya Sabha seats fell vacant after BJP leaders Amit Shah and Smriti Irani were elected to the Lok Sabha. 

The grounds on which the order had been challenged were the Election Commission's notifications that treated the two vacant seats to be of two different categories and also required bypolls to hold their elections separately; this was illegal and in violations of the provisions of the Constitution of India, 1949, Representation of People's Act, 1951 and Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. As per the Constitution, election to the vacant seat of Rajya Sabha should be held together so that the system of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote can be applied. 

The caveat has been filed through Advocate Swarupama Chaturvedi in the Apex Court registry. It says that he should be heard before the court decides to entertain and pass directions on petitions of the Gujarat High Court order. The Gujarat High Court on February 4th, 2020 dismissed a batch of petitions that challenged the election of Jaishankar to the Rajya Sabha. 

 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email