38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Know what is Gujarat Freedom of Religion Amendment Bill 2021

By Namya Bose      05 April, 2021 03:32 PM      0 Comments
State of Gujarat passes Gujarat Freedom of Religion Amendment Bill

On April 1 2021, the Gujarat Assembly amended the Act of 2003 (Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act) by passing the Gujarat Freedom of Religion Amendment Bill 2021. It seeks to punish forcible or fraudulent religious conversion by marriage, by amending the Act. 

The Bill puts forth strict measures with almost 3 to 5 years of minimum imprisonment in cases of individual conversion and 4 to 6 years in cases that involve either a minor or a womanor people under section 4(A).

This Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill 2021 is passed in line with various other similar laws that were passed in states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. 

The Bill states in its Objects and Reasons, there are episodes of religious conversion promising better lifestyle, divine blessings and impersonation. There is an emerging trend in which women are lured to marriage for the purpose of religious conversion

The Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act 2003 under section 2 of the act, mentions only two categories for offer of temptation being :

1. Any gift or gratification, either in cash or kind, and 

2. a grant of any material benefit, monetary or otherwise.

The Bill proposed the addition of a third option of "better lifestyle, divine blessings or otherwise".

Section 3 of the act originally prohibited forcible conversion from one religion to another by use of force or by allurement or by fraudulent means, but now will prohibit acts such as forcible religious conversion by marriage or aiding a person to get married.

The new Bill under section 4B of the act, also proposes that the marriages done with this purpose of forced conversion must be declared void. The bill made the offences under the act Cognizable and non-bailable in nature.

The Bill of Amendment also calls for inclusion of some other categories who shall be deemed to have taken part in committing the offence and they will be charged as if they actually committed the offence , them being :

  • A person who does or omits to do any act for the purpose of enabling or aiding another person to commit the offence,
  • A person who aids, abets, counsel convinces another person to commit the offence.

It has now been laid down that anyone contravening the law, everyone in charge of that violation would be held responsible and could be potentially be imprisoned for 3-10 years and a fine of 5 lakhs could be imposed on them.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email