38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, May 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

NHRC Recommends UP Government to Pay Rs. 3 Lakhs as Compensation to Man Imprisoned on Mistaken Identity

By Mathews Savio      03 May, 2021 05:41 PM      0 Comments
NHRC UP Government Mistaken Identity

The National Human Rights Commission on Wednesday (28/04/2021) recommended the Uttar Pradesh Government to take necessary actions for release, with dignity, of an individual imprisoned for the past 4 years on mistaken identity.

The Commission send its recommendation through the Chief Secretary of the state after getting no reply from the state on a show-cause notice issued earlier. 

The recommendation came in a complaint registered by the victim with the Commission. In the complaint, the victim alleged that he was undergoing imprisonment for more than four years in place of one Julum Sharma in case no 347/2000 under Sections 147 (Rioting), 148 (Rioting armed with deadly weapons), 149, 506 (Criminal intimidation) and 302 (Punishment for Murder) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. It was further alleged that the police had failed to arrest the real culprit and had instead arrested the complainant.

The Investigation Division of the commission found that under the case in question 5 people were accused in the Azamgarh District. The complainant was arrested after 13 years of filing the FIR under a non-bailable warrant issued against one Julum Sharma.  The commission found that the police has failed to establish how the complainant, Singhasan Vishwakarma was the same as Julum Sharma. The four other co-accused were acquitted by the court in 2002 before the arrest of the complainant.

The Commission observed that:

It was a clear case of negligence by the police.

The Commission also observed that the Judicial Officers also made mistake by not verifying the identity of the complainant before sending him to jail.

The Commission recommended that action should be taken for the release of the victim with dignity and he should be paid Rs three lakh as relief for violation of his human rights. Besides, the DGP, Uttar Pradesh has been asked to submit within four weeks a report in the action taken against the erring police personnel, who arrested the victim without varying his identity.

The commission has also directed its registry to send a copy of its proceeding in the matter to the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court for appropriate action.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

the-faustian-bargain-judicial-paternalism-legislative-silence-and-the-crisis-of-masculinity-in-indian-matrimonial-law
Trending Vantage Points
The Faustian Bargain: Judicial Paternalism, Legislative Silence, and the Crisis of Masculinity in Indian Matrimonial Law

Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani critically examines Indian matrimonial law, judicial paternalism, and gender bias, calling for gender-neutral domestic violence laws and equal constitutional protection for men and women alike.

11 May, 2026 11:07 AM
sc-refuses-to-hear-pleas-against-aor-exam-2026-cancellation
Trending Judiciary
SC Refuses To Hear Pleas Against AOR Exam 2026 Cancellation

Supreme Court refuses to hear pleas against cancellation of AOR Exam 2026 and asks aggrieved lawyers to submit representation to the CJI.

11 May, 2026 02:22 PM

TOP STORIES

mamata-banerjee-refuses-to-resign-after-historic-election-defeat
Trending Political NEWS
Mamata Banerjee Refuses to Resign After Historic Election Defeat

Mamata Banerjee defies convention, refuses to resign despite massive poll defeat—triggering a constitutional debate over mandate, legality, and democratic norms.

05 May, 2026 10:29 AM
delhi-hc-rejects-spicejets-review-petition-against-144-crore-deposit-order-imposes-50000-costs
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rejects SpiceJet’s Review Petition Against ₹144 Crore Deposit Order, Imposes ₹50,000 Costs

Delhi High Court rejects SpiceJet’s review against ₹144 crore deposit order in Maran dispute, imposes ₹50,000 costs for non-compliance with directions.

05 May, 2026 12:36 PM
silence-of-differently-abled-rape-victim-cannot-suppress-truth-courts-must-focus-on-substance-over-manner-of-expression-sikkim-hc
Trending Judiciary
Silence of Differently-Abled Rape Victim Cannot Suppress Truth; Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Manner of Expression: Sikkim HC [Read Judgment]

Sikkim High Court upholds rape conviction, ruling that a differently-abled victim’s silence cannot override credible medical and eyewitness evidence.

05 May, 2026 12:45 PM
sc-stays-5-lakh-cost-condition-for-setting-aside-non-bailable-warrants-against-accused-in-sfio-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Stays ₹5 Lakh Cost Condition for Setting Aside Non-Bailable Warrants Against Accused in SFIO Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court stays ₹5 lakh cost condition for setting aside non-bailable warrants in SFIO case, says validity of such condition needs examination.

05 May, 2026 12:56 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email