38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, August 16, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Rameshwaram Café blast case by ISIS radicals after failed IED attack on state BJP office on Pran Pratishtha day: NIA

By Jhanak Sharma      10 September, 2024 01:27 PM      0 Comments
Rameshwaram Cafe blast case by ISIS radicals after failed IED attack on state BJP office on Pran Pratishtha day NIA

NEW DELHI: The National Investigation Agency on Monday filed the charge sheets four accused in the high-profile Bengaluru Rameshwaram Café blast case, claiming it was carried out by ISIS radicals after their bid for IED attack at the State BJP Office, Malleshwaram on the day of Pran Pratishtha ceremony at Ayodhya on January 22, 2024.

The accused, identified as Mussavir Hussain Shazib, Abdul Matheen Ahmed Taaha, Maaz Muneer Ahmed and Muzammil Shareef, have been charge sheeted under relevant sections of IPC, UA(P) Act, Explosive Substances Act and PDLP Act.  

All four were earlier arrested and are currently in judicial custody in the case.

The IED explosion, which took place on March 1, this year at the Rameshwaram Café, Brookfield, ITPL Bengaluru, had left nine persons injured and extensively damaged the hotel property.

NIA, which started investigation in the case on March 3, conducted several technical and field investigation in coordination with various state police forces and other agencies.

The investigations revealed that Shazib was the man who had planted the bomb. He, along with Taaha, had previously been absconding since 2020 after the Al-Hind module was busted. Extensive searches by the NIA had led to their arrest from their hideout in West Bengal 42 days after the Rameshwaram café explosion.

The two men, hailing from Shivamogga District of Karnataka, were ISIS radicals and had earlier conspired to do Hijrah to ISIS territories in Syria. They were actively involved in radicalizing other gullible Muslim youth to the ISIS ideology, and Maaz Muneer Ahmed and Muzammil Shareef were among such youth.

Taaha and Shazib had used fraudulently obtained Indian SIM cards and Indian bank accounts, and also used various Indian and Bangladeshi Identity documents downloaded from the Dark Web.

Investigations further revealed that Taaha had been introduced by an ex-convict, Shoaib Ahmed Mirza, to Mohammed Shaheed Faisal, an absconder in the LeT Bengaluru conspiracy case. Taaha then introduced Faisal, his handler, to Mehaboob Pasha, an accused in the Al-Hind ISIS module case, and to Khaja Mohideen, Amir of ISIS South India, and later also to Maaz Muneer Ahmed.

Taaha and Shazib were funded by their handler through crypto currencies, which Taaha converted to Fiat with the help of various Telegram based P2P platforms. The funds were used by the accused to perpetrate various acts of violence in Bengaluru, investigations further revealed. These included a failed IED attack at the State BJP Office, Malleshwaram, Bengaluru, on the day of Pran Pratishtha ceremony at Ayodhya on January 22, 2024, after which the two key accused had planned the Rameshwaram café blast.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Kerala NIA Court Sentences Three to Life Imprisonment in Professor's Hand Chopping Case Kerala NIA Court Sentences Three to Life Imprisonment in Professor's Hand Chopping Case

A special NIA court in Kerala has sentenced three members of the banned Popular Front of India to life imprisonment for chopping off the hand of a college professor in a sensational 2010 case. The court termed the incident a "terrorist act" and highlighted its challenge to the secular fabric of the nation.

Supreme Court Raises Concerns Over House Arrest Order for Gautam Navlakha in Bhima Koregaon Case Supreme Court Raises Concerns Over House Arrest Order for Gautam Navlakha in Bhima Koregaon Case

The Supreme Court expresses reservations about its decision to place Bhima Koregaon case accused Gautam Navalakha under house arrest, citing concerns about setting a wrong precedent. The court defers a decision on relocating Navalakha for eight weeks.

SC dismisses Union govt's plea against bail to Maoist financer in case of attack on police party in Jharkhand [Read Judgment] SC dismisses Union govt's plea against bail to Maoist financer in case of attack on police party in Jharkhand [Read Judgment]

SC rejects govt's plea against bail for accused in Jharkhand police attack case, citing absence of violated bail conditions.

SC grants bail to Gautam Navlakha in Bhima Koregaon case SC grants bail to Gautam Navlakha in Bhima Koregaon case

SC grants bail to Gautam Navlakha in Bhima Koregaon case after noting lengthy trial process and his deteriorating health, requires Rs 20 lakh payment to NIA.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email