38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Why did Nitin Gadkari send legal notice to Congress leaders?

By Mahima Katal      02 March, 2024 05:33 PM      0 Comments
Why did Nitin Gadkari send legal notice to Congress leaders

New Delhi: Union Minister Nitin Gadkari has issued a legal notice to All India Congress Committee (AICC) president Mallikarjun Kharge and general secretary Jairam Ramesh for posting a clip of his interview without context, alleging that it affected his reputation and that of the BJP.

The legal notices claimed that Gadkari's interview in the video clip was twisted and distorted.

The issue stems from a 19-second video clip of an interview taken by India Today Group's Lallantop with Gadkari, which the Congress leaders are accused of sharing out of context to damage Gadkari's reputation.

In the video, Gadkari can be seen talking about the poor, farmers and villagers. The Union Minister said in this interview that villagers, poor, labourers and farmers are unhappy.

Villages, poor, labourers and farmers are unhappy...The villages do not have good roads, there is no water to drink, there are no good hospitals, there are no good schools, the Union Minister noted.

The video shared by Congress, however cut the part before this where Gadkari talks about the issue of rural-urban migration. It also cuts the part after this where he spoke of the efforts undertaken by the NDA government to improve the lives of villagers, poor, labourers and farmers.

Watch the video here: 

Heres what Congress said:

I have read the legal notice sent by himWe will respond to it. We have made no mistake. We used their own words, I cant understand why they are upset, Ramesh said while speaking to media.
 



Share this article:

About:

Mahima Katal, journalist with a commitment to high-quality research, writing, and production. Proven...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Karnataka High Court Grants Protection to Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary Amid Fake News Controversy Karnataka High Court Grants Protection to Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary Amid Fake News Controversy

Karnataka High Court protects journalist Sudhir Chaudhary and Aaj Tak from coercive action over alleged 'fake news' about Karnataka government's minority scheme. Get the latest updates on this legal battle.

"...Victim could've gauged accused person's intention", Delhi HC allows bail in rape case by Congress worker [Read Judgment] "...Victim could've gauged accused person's intention", Delhi HC allows bail in rape case by Congress worker [Read Judgment]

Allowing anticipatory bail to accused Mehran Anjum Mir in a rape case recently, the Delhi High Court has reasoned that the victim could have gauged the intention of the petitioner as she is a grown up lady and despite that she accompanied the petitioner twice to hotel room. Read more here.

SC Rejects Congress Leader Khera's Plea to Quash Case Over Remarks on PM Modi SC Rejects Congress Leader Khera's Plea to Quash Case Over Remarks on PM Modi

The Supreme Court of India dismisses Congress leader Pawan Khera's plea to quash criminal proceedings initiated against him for remarks about Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The case, which involves a comment made at a Mumbai press conference, was not found eligible for quashing by the Supreme Court.

SC dismisses Punjab govt plea against bail to Sukhpal Singh Khaira SC dismisses Punjab govt plea against bail to Sukhpal Singh Khaira

Supreme Court dismisses Punjab govt's plea, upholds bail for Congress MLA Sukhpal Khaira in NDPS case; evidence and threats contested.

TRENDING NEWS

allahabad-hc-condemns-police-for-taking-woman-into-possession-despite-stay-orders-immediate-release
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Condemns Police for Taking Woman Into ‘Possession’ Despite Stay; Orders Immediate Release [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court slammed Muzaffarnagar Police for violating a stay order, declaring the detenue a major and ordering her immediate release.

02 December, 2025 09:27 PM
rera-orders-cannot-be-executed-through-civil-court-execution-petitions-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
RERA Orders Cannot Be Executed Through Civil Court Execution Petitions: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules RERA orders cannot be executed through civil courts, holding that such orders are not decrees under the CPC.

02 December, 2025 10:19 PM

TOP STORIES

forklifts-and-cranes-used-inside-factory-are-motor-vehicles-registration-and-tax-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Forklifts And Cranes Used Inside Factory Are ‘Motor Vehicles’; Registration & Tax Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that forklifts and cranes used inside factories are ‘motor vehicles’, requiring mandatory registration and tax under motor vehicle laws.

27 November, 2025 10:29 AM
loading-of-mineral-constitutes-transportation-us-21-4-of-the-mmdra-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Loading of Mineral Constitutes ‘Transportation’ U/S 21(4) Of The MMDRA: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC rules that loading minerals into a vehicle amounts to transportation under Section 21(4) of the MMDRA, upholding seizure for illegal mineral movement.

27 November, 2025 10:43 AM
sc-upholds-himachal-pradeshs-cancellation-of-tender-loi-sets-aside-high-court-order
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Himachal Pradesh’s Cancellation of Tender LoI, Sets Aside High Court Order [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds Himachal Pradesh’s cancellation of a PDS tender LoI, ruling it created no enforceable rights and overturning the High Court order.

27 November, 2025 10:57 AM
chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-pg-medical-admission-rules-for-violating-article-14-rejects-institutional-domicile-preference-upholds-merit
Trending Judiciary
Chhattisgarh HC Quashes PG Medical Admission Rules for Violating Article 14, Rejects Institutional/Domicile Preference, Upholds Merit [Read Order]

Chhattisgarh High Court quashes PG medical admission rules, holding institutional and domicile-based preferences unconstitutional and affirming merit.

27 November, 2025 11:16 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email