38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Kim Kardashian Sued For Posting Her Own Picture Publicly Without Taking Permission Of The Photographer

By LawStreet News Network      24 January, 2020 04:01 PM      0 Comments
Kim Kardashian Sued For Posting Her Own Picture Publicly Without Taking Permission Of The Photographer

A photographer on 22 January, 2020 filed a case against Kim Kardashian in a New York federal court. The case has been filed as the Keeping Up With the Kardashians star allegedly posted a picture taken by the photographer without taking his permission. The picture shows her and her husband, Kanye West walking together.

Saeed Bolden, the photographer, claims that he snapped and owns the copyright to a photo of the couple that the star posted on her Instagram page in October 2018. In the picture, both stars are smiling as they walk together with a group of people.

The U.S. Copyright Office shows that last year, Saeed registered a copyright for an image of Kim that he took in 2018. Kim had used a black and white version of the image clicked by Bolden and the post had received 2.2 million likes, according to the lawsuit.

Saeed claims in his filing that the reality star did not license the photograph from him for her page, nor took his permission or consent to publish the photograph, and infringed his copyright in the photograph by reproducing and publicly displaying it. He has further contended that this has been willful, intentional, and purposeful, in disregard of and indifference to his rights. He has demanded a jury trial and has not put monetary value in his lawsuit.

The lawsuit also names Skims body, Kims shape wear line, as a plaintiff although the picture was posted on her personal account.

Author: Nandini Gandhi

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email