38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Video Game Developers-Sega And SI Sued by Manchester United for Trademark Infringement

By Manthan Pandit      14 July, 2020 01:49 PM      0 Comments
Video Game Developers-Sega And SI Sued by Manchester United for Trademark Infringement

In a recent news, Manchester United sued the publisher and producer of football games, Sega Publishing and Sports Interactive (SI) over a trademark infringement case.

Football Manager, a decades-old game of best-loved fantasy football, started its operations in 1992. At the time, it was called 'Championship Boss,' but after a new tie-up with Sega in 2003, the game lost its previous name. Every year since 2004, more than 15 games have been released by the publishers, adding to the football gaming simulation series.

In the recent dispute, United was aggrieved by the usage of its trademark features extensively throughout the game.. The club further claimed that Sega and SI not only used the name unlawfully but also infringed the trademark logo by simply replacing the team crest with a simpler red and white striped logo.

The complaint stated, this action deprives the registered proprietor of its right to have the club crest licensed.

On the other hand, the game-developing company replied by claiming that using the trade name is, "a fair reference in a football sense to the Manchester United Football Team" and the same has been used in the game since its beginning, but the club has not previously raised any concern. Moreover, by bringing forth such a complaint the club is preventing legitimate competition in the video games field by preventing parties not licensed by the claimant from using the name of the Manchester United football team within such games.

The hearing in the matter took place on Friday, 10th July 2020.After listening to submissions by both parties, Justice Morgan directed United to amend its claim to a later date and that till then the judgment stands reserved.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email