38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, January 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

18 Former Judges write to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy

By Jhanak Sharma      25 August, 2025 03:09 PM      0 Comments
18 Former Judges write to Union Home Minister Amit Shah criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy

NEW DELHI: A group of 18 retired judges -- eight from Supreme Court and 11 from various State High Courts -- have shot off a letter to the Union Home Minister Amit Shah for "misinterpreting" the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Salwa Judum case.

They emphasised on the importance of according and preserving Institutional dignity.

"A Judge in his tenure decides innumerable cases and does so on the anvil of legal issues and purely by law so to suggest that in this case the Judge in question has done so on personal ideology is undermining the institutional integrity. Every citizen has a right to criticize a judgement but to do so on personal reasons will erode the belief of the public in the concerned institutions," they said.

Shah had allegedly accused Justice B Sudershan Reddy, a former Judge of the Supreme Court, of “supporting” Maoism.

Reddy is joint opposition nominee for the post of Vice President.

Shah had claimed that Left Wing Extremism would have ended by 2020 in the absence of the Salwa Judum judgement.

In reaction, the former judges said, "The statement of the Union Home Minister Amit Shah publicly misinterpreting the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Salva Judum case is unfortunate. The judgment nowhere supports, either expressly or by compelling implication of its text, Naxalism or its ideology."

Their statement further stated that while the campaign for the office of the Vice President of India may well be ideological, it can be conducted civilly and with dignity. Criticizing the ideology of the either candidate should be eschewed.

"Prejudicial misinterpretation of a judgement of the Supreme Court by a high political functionary is likely to have a chilling effect on the judges of the Supreme Court shaking the independence of the judiciary. Out of respect for the office of the Vice President of India, it would be wise to refrain from name calling," the letter further said.

The eight Supreme Court judges (former) who wrote to the HM are: Justices Kurien Joseph, Madan B Lokur and J Chelameswar, A K Patnaik, Abhay S. Oka, Gopala Gowda and Vikramjit Sen.

The former Chief Justices of High Courts, who were also part of this letter written process were: Justices Govind Mathur, S. Muralidhar and Sanjib Bannerjee. The former Judges of High Courts, who was part of this were: Justices Anjana Prakash, C. Praveen Kumar, A. Gopala Reddy, G Raghuram, K. Kannan, K. Chandru B Chandrakumar, Kailash Gambhir and Mohan Gopal.

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

accused-need-not-appear-on-every-date-after-bail-in-appeals-sc
Trending Judiciary
Accused Need Not Appear on Every Date After Bail in Appeals: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules accused on bail after suspension of sentence need not appear on every hearing date in appellate or revisional courts.

19 January, 2026 12:47 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-press-councils-rejection-of-editors-guilds-claim-in-15th-press-council-constitution
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Press Council’s Rejection of Editors Guild’s Claim in 15th Press Council Constitution [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upheld Press Council of India’s rejection of Editors Guild’s claim, citing delay and non-compliance, and declined to interfere in 15th Press Council constitution.

19 January, 2026 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

madras-hc-seeks-larger-bench-to-reconsider-bar-on-enrolment-of-law-graduates-with-pending-criminal-cases
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Seeks Larger Bench To Reconsider Bar On Enrolment Of Law Graduates With Pending Criminal Cases [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers to larger bench to reconsider bar on enrolment of law graduates with pending criminal cases under Advocates Act.

15 January, 2026 05:28 PM
madras-hc-state-organizes-jallikattu-at-avaniyapuram-private-committees-cannot-claim-independent-right
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC: State Organizes Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; Private Committees Cannot Claim Independent Right [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that only the State can organize Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; private committees have no independent right to conduct the event.

15 January, 2026 05:52 PM
sc-delivers-split-verdict-on-section-17a-of-prevention-of-corruption-act-refers-matter-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Delivers Split Verdict on Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, Refers Matter to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court delivers a split verdict on Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, with judges differing on its validity and referring the issue to a larger bench.

15 January, 2026 08:04 PM
daughter-in-law-widowed-after-father-in-laws-death-entitled-to-maintenance-from-his-estate-sc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Widowed After Father-in-Law’s Death Entitled to Maintenance from His Estate: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a daughter-in-law widowed after her father-in-law’s death can claim maintenance from his estate under Hindu law.

15 January, 2026 09:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email