38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, February 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

No strict action against Nagpur resident for tweeting against the State Government and its functioning in the Sushant Singh Rajput case [READ PETITION]

By Ayushi Wargantiwar      01 September, 2020 05:46 PM      0 Comments
No strict action against Nagpur resident for tweeting against the State Government and its functioning in the Sushant Singh Rajput case [READ PETITION]

Sameer Thakkar, a resident of Nagpur, was recently booked under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 for tweeting against the state government and its functioning in the Sushant Singh Rajput case. He had previously filed a PIL at Bombay HCseeking directions for a CBI probe in the Sushant Rajput suicide matter which was eventually disposed of as the matter was already before the SC for hearing at the time.

The Criminal Writ petitionfiled by Sameer Thakkaralleges that the FIR against him has been filed by a Shiv Sena worker and is an obstruction to the citizensRight to Freedom of Speech and Expression. He also stated that due to the said FIR, police had been constantly coming to his house and harassing him and his family. 

The petition claimed, "The present FIR is a part of multifarious FIR's and complaints lodged by the Shiv Sena Party members and supporters in different jurisdictions, relating to some tweets tweeted by the petitioner, completely based on facts regarding the functioning of the Maharashtra Government and its leaders. It is submitted that the present FIR is a part of a well-planned, vindictive, and malicious campaign launched by the Shiv Sena Party and its members just to muzzle and harass the petitioner for speaking the truth about the functioning of the government in Maharashtra and its leaders, particularly the Chief Minister of Maharashtra and his son, for their response and silence on vital issues."

The court, after observing the facts of the case issued a final disposal notice to the Respondent and noted that Shri AS Fulzele, learned APP waives notice for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Meanwhile, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner through investigation may proceed, and if completed, charge sheet shall not be filed. Stands over two weeks.

 

[READ PETITION]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

big-legal-tech-meet-at-delhi-hc-sc-judge-sanjay-karol-to-be-chief-guest-at-indian-law-and-ai-congress-2026
Trending Legal Insiders
Big Legal-Tech Meet at Delhi HC, SC Judge Sanjay Karol to be Chief Guest at Indian Law & AI Congress 2026

Indian Law & AI Congress 2026 at Delhi High Court on Feb 11. Justice Sanjay Karol to be chief guest. Live streaming by LawStreet Journal.

10 February, 2026 10:27 AM
kerala-hc-affirms-vicarious-liability-of-managing-director-under-section-141-ni-act-for-dishonoured-cheques
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Affirms Vicarious Liability of Managing Director Under Section 141 NI Act for Dishonoured Cheques [Read Order]

Kerala High Court upholds Managing Director’s vicarious liability under Section 141 NI Act in cheque dishonour case, citing Supreme Court guidelines.

10 February, 2026 11:41 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-case-against-influencer-who-claimed-assamese-women-practise-black-magic-and-convert-men-into-animals
Trending Judiciary
Gauhati HC Quashes Case Against Influencer Who Claimed Assamese Women Practise Black Magic and Convert Men Into Animals [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court quashes case against influencer Abhishek Kar over remarks on black magic in Assam, holds offences under BNS, IT Act not made out.

11 February, 2026 03:08 PM
high-courts-cannot-nullify-arbitration-proceedings-while-substituting-arbitrators-sc
Trending Judiciary
High Courts Cannot Nullify Arbitration Proceedings While Substituting Arbitrators: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot nullify arbitration proceedings while appointing substitute arbitrators under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act.

11 February, 2026 03:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email