38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 20, 2024
Judiciary

Allahabad HC directs Passport Authority to decide on application without prior court permission in pending criminal cases [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      19 July, 2024 10:03 AM      0 Comments
Allahabad HC directs Passport Authority to decide on application without prior court permission in pending criminal cases

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court has delivered a significant order directing the passport authority to consider and decide on a passport application within a specified timeframe, clarifying that no prior court permission is required for issuing passports to individuals with pending criminal cases.

A Division Bench comprising Justices Alok Mathur and Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal allowed a writ petition filed by one Umapati, seeking direction to the passport authority to decide on his passport application.

The court noted that the petitioner had applied for a passport on January 20, 2022, but no decision had been taken by the passport authority due to two pending criminal cases against him.

Rejecting the argument of the Deputy Solicitor General that the petitioner should obtain permission from the court where the criminal cases are pending, the court held, “This Court is of the considered view that no prior permission from the competent court is required where the criminal cases are pending for the issuance of a passport under the Indian Passport Act, and no such provision has been envisaged in the said Act.”

Also Read: Passport important document; in absence of crime or suspicion it cannot be seized by Investigating agencies: Kerala High Court  [Read Order]

The court further observed that the passport authority is mandated to make a decision as per Sections 5 and 6 of the Indian Passport Act. It stated, “If he is of the opinion that it is a fit case for the grant of a passport, he may pass an appropriate order for the issuance of the passport, and in case he feels that conditions exist for refusal of the grant of the passport, he may pass an appropriate order considering the grounds of Section 6 of the Indian Passport Act.”

Expressing its view on the statutory obligations of the passport authority, the court stated, “Once an application is made for the grant of a passport, then the authority has to make a decision in terms of the statutory provisions under the Indian Passport Act, and accordingly a case for interference is made out.”

The court directed the passport authority to consider and decide on the petitioner’s application dated January 20, 2022, in accordance with the law within four weeks from the date a certified copy of the order is produced before him.

In conclusion, while clarifying that no prior court permission is required for passport issuance in cases of pending criminal matters, the court directed the passport authority to expeditiously decide on the petitioner’s application as per the provisions of the Indian Passport Act.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket Sourav is a student at National Law University and Judicial Academy Assam.



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

CBI failed to complete probe into Mathuras 2016 Jawahar Bagh incident. HC to take up PIL by Ashwini Upadhyay CBI failed to complete probe into Mathuras 2016 Jawahar Bagh incident. HC to take up PIL by Ashwini Upadhyay

NEW DELHI: The Allahabad High Court is scheduled to take up on Friday a plea filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay related to CBI probe into the infamous Jawahar Bagh incident of June 2, 2016, which the central investigating agency failed to complete even after 80 months of the order.

TRENDING NEWS

delhi-hc-orders-mcd-to-pay-10-lakh-compensation-in-minors-death-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC orders MCD to pay ₹10 Lakh compensation in minor's death case [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC directs MCD to pay ₹10 lakh for a minor's death due to negligence, applying res ipsa loquitur and affirming compensation for fundamental rights violations.

19 September, 2024 10:36 AM
sc-orders-release-of-convict-on-personal-bond-cites-injustice-in-denying-bail-due-to-inability-to-furnish-local-surety
Trending Judiciary
SC orders release of convict on Personal Bond, cites injustice in denying bail due to inability to furnish Local Surety [Read Order]

SC: Justice delivery mechanism must consider plight of indigent convicts unable to furnish local surety, orders release of convict on personal bond.

19 September, 2024 11:05 AM

TOP STORIES

rajasthan-hc-orders-10-year-passport-for-undertrial-in-matrimonial-dispute-cites-right-to-livelihood
Trending Judiciary
Rajasthan HC orders 10-year passport for undertrial in matrimonial dispute, cites right to livelihood [Read Order]

Rajasthan HC directs issuance of a 10-year passport to an undertrial in a matrimonial dispute, upholding the right to livelihood despite ongoing legal proceedings.

14 September, 2024 05:04 PM
himachal-pradesh-hc-clarifies-the-scope-of-section-482-crpc-in-compoundable-offences
Trending Judiciary
Himachal Pradesh HC clarifies the scope of Section 482 CrPC in compoundable offences [Read Order]

Himachal Pradesh HC clarifies that Section 482 CrPC cannot be invoked for compoundable offences when an alternative remedy under Section 320(1) is available.

14 September, 2024 05:36 PM
sc-bars-kejriwal-from-commenting-on-cbi-case-in-liquor-policy
Trending Judiciary
SC bars Kejriwal from commenting on CBI case in liquor policy

SC restrains Kejriwal from commenting on CBI case in liquor policy, grants bail with conditions, prohibiting visits to CM office and signing files.

16 September, 2024 10:33 AM
sc-rejects-plea-to-re-appear-in-neet-ug-for-not-being-allowed-to-carry-handkerchief
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects plea to re-appear in NEET UG for not being allowed to carry handkerchief [Read Judgment]

SC dismisses NEET UG candidate's plea to reappear due to a handkerchief ban, citing no significant impact on performance from hyperhidrosis during the exam.

16 September, 2024 10:37 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email