New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Rahul Gandhi Over ‘Fight Against Indian State’ Remark

By Samriddhi Ojha      1 month ago      0 Comments
Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Rahul Gandhi Over Fight Against Indian State Remark

Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a plea seeking the registration of a First Information Report against Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi over his remark that he was in a “fight against the Indian State,” made during a speech at the inauguration of the Congress party’s new headquarters in New Delhi.

Justice Vikram D. Chauhan dismissed the plea, which challenged a trial court’s refusal to direct the registration of a criminal case against Gandhi in the matter.

The controversy arose from a speech delivered by Gandhi on January 15, 2025, during the inauguration of the party’s new headquarters, Indira Bhawan, in New Delhi. While addressing party workers, Gandhi alleged that the BJP and RSS had captured every institution in the country, including the judiciary and the media, and stated: “Do not think we are fighting a fair fight… If you believe we are fighting against a political organisation called BJP and RSS, you have not understood… We are now fighting not just the BJP and RSS, but the Indian State itself.”

Following the speech, Simran Gupta, an office-bearer of Hindu Shakti Dal, filed a complaint alleging that Gandhi’s remarks were seditious and anti-national. She contended that the statement portrayed the Indian State as an adversary, was intended to destabilise the country, hurt the sentiments of citizens, and undermined national integrity.

The Additional District and Sessions Judge at Chandausi, Sambhal, dismissed her application seeking registration of an FIR, labelling the case as weak and holding that the remarks did not meet the threshold for criminal prosecution. Gupta subsequently approached the Allahabad High Court, which has now also dismissed her plea.

Case Details

  • Court: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
  • Judge: Justice Vikram D. Chauhan
  • Date of Order: May 1, 2026
  • Petitioner: Simran Gupta, office-bearer of Hindu Shakti Dal
  • Outcome: Plea dismissed


Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC

"Explore former Justice SN Srivastava's statement on the minority status in India, as he discusses the evolving dynamics of religious and cultural representation in the country.

Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email