38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash F.I.R Against Munawwar Rana For Remark Comparing Maharishi Valmiki To Taliban

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      09 September, 2021 04:29 PM      0 Comments
Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash

On 6th September, 2021 the Allahabad High Court refused to quash the F.I.R against the Urdu poet Munnawar Rana for a remark he made in front of the press in which he compared Maharishi Valmiki and the Taliban. 

The Bench of  Honble judges, Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Saroj Yadav observed that the remark made by the accused had hurt the sentiments of the majority community and the comparison was an unnecessary remark. 

BACKGROUND

Munnawar Rana, an Urdu poet on being asked to comment on the occupation of Afghanistan by the Taliban stated that Taliban will become Valmiki after ten years; Valmiki was a writer and in the Hindu religion, any one can be said to be a God."

The All India Hindu Mahasabha and Samajik Sarokar Foundation filed an F.I.R against the poet in Hazratganj Kotwali of Lucknow under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

ACCUSATIONS 

The above-mentioned organizations have filed the case against the poet on the basis of Section 153-A, 501 (1)-B and 295 -A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

OBSERVATIONS OF THE COURT 
The court held that the case filed against the accused under Section 153-A, 501 (1)-B and 295 -A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is prima facie relevant since the sentiments of the majority community have been hurt by the callous remarks of the accused. 

On the grounds that the applicant had not been careful with his statements in front of the media, and was disrespectful, the High Court refused to quash the F.I.R, even though the petitioner tried to prove his innocence. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email