38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 07, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Allahabad HC Issues Notice on Plea Challenging Designation of 90 Senior Advocates [Read Order]

By Samriddhi Ojha      13 December, 2025 07:24 PM      0 Comments
Allahabad HC Issues Notice on Plea Challenging Designation of 90 Senior Advocates

Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has issued notice on a petition challenging the Full Court’s decision dated November 5, 2025, by which 90 advocates were designated as Senior Advocates. A Division Bench comprising Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Justice Rajeev Bharti directed the petitioner, Advocate Anupam Mehrotra, to implead all 90 designated advocates as respondents and serve notice upon them by e-mail. The Bench further directed the Registrar General and other respondents to file their counter-affidavits within four weeks, with rejoinder affidavits to be filed within two weeks thereafter. The matter is next listed for hearing on January 28, 2026.

The petition contends that the designation exercise was conducted in violation of the guidelines laid down in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2017) and the precedent in Jitender v. State (NCT of Delhi). According to the plea, the Permanent Committee for Senior Designations evaluated applications within a compressed timeframe between September 30 and October 4, 2025, granting only minimal time per candidate. The petition asserts that, under such conditions, the process could not amount to a fair, reasonable, or meaningful assessment of merit.

Further, the petition alleges that for a significant number of designated advocates, there were fewer than ten reported judgments in the preceding five years, and that for about 27 of them, there were no reported cases at all. It is also alleged that the Committee unduly emphasised income as a criterion, a factor previously held to be irrelevant under the jurisprudence governing senior designations. The petitioner further claims that despite being recommended by a sitting judge, his own application was rejected without recording any reasons or disclosing whether the recommending judge was consulted. The petition characterises the exercise as having “prioritised wealth over merit, knowledge, and experience.”

The High Court’s notification of 90 new Senior Advocates (including five women) came after a gap of nearly three years since the last round of designations. With the latest round, the total number of Senior Advocates at the Allahabad High Court, including both the Allahabad and Lucknow Benches, reportedly exceeds 230.

By issuing notice to all 90 designated advocates, the Court has opened the door for a detailed adjudication into the validity and fairness of the designation process adopted in the November 2025 exercise.

Case Details:

Bench: Hon’ble Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Hon’ble Justice Rajeev Bharti

Date of Notice: December 10, 2025

Next Hearing: January 28, 2026
Petitioner: Anupam Mehrotra (in person)

Respondents: The 90 designated Senior Advocates; Registrar General, Allahabad High Court; and other relevant administrative authorities

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC

"Explore former Justice SN Srivastava's statement on the minority status in India, as he discusses the evolving dynamics of religious and cultural representation in the country.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM

TOP STORIES

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM
epf-penalty-for-delayed-contribution-cannot-be-reduced-below-25-of-arrears-cgit-order-modified-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
EPF Penalty for Delayed Contribution Cannot Be Reduced Below 25% of Arrears; CGIT Order Modified: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules EPF penalty for delayed PF contributions cannot be reduced below 25% of arrears including interest; CGIT order modified.

02 March, 2026 01:57 PM
scwla-condemns-kanpur-bar-association-holi-event-seeks-disciplinary-action-and-gender-sensitisation-guidelines
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Condemns Kanpur Bar Association Holi Event, Seeks Disciplinary Action & Gender Sensitisation Guidelines [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns Kanpur Bar Holi event, seeks apology, disciplinary action & gender sensitisation norms over alleged objectification of women.

02 March, 2026 03:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email