38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Allahabad HC Issues Notice on Plea Challenging Designation of 90 Senior Advocates [Read Order]

By Samriddhi Ojha      13 December, 2025 07:24 PM      0 Comments
Allahabad HC Issues Notice on Plea Challenging Designation of 90 Senior Advocates

Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has issued notice on a petition challenging the Full Court’s decision dated November 5, 2025, by which 90 advocates were designated as Senior Advocates. A Division Bench comprising Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Justice Rajeev Bharti directed the petitioner, Advocate Anupam Mehrotra, to implead all 90 designated advocates as respondents and serve notice upon them by e-mail. The Bench further directed the Registrar General and other respondents to file their counter-affidavits within four weeks, with rejoinder affidavits to be filed within two weeks thereafter. The matter is next listed for hearing on January 28, 2026.

The petition contends that the designation exercise was conducted in violation of the guidelines laid down in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2017) and the precedent in Jitender v. State (NCT of Delhi). According to the plea, the Permanent Committee for Senior Designations evaluated applications within a compressed timeframe between September 30 and October 4, 2025, granting only minimal time per candidate. The petition asserts that, under such conditions, the process could not amount to a fair, reasonable, or meaningful assessment of merit.

Further, the petition alleges that for a significant number of designated advocates, there were fewer than ten reported judgments in the preceding five years, and that for about 27 of them, there were no reported cases at all. It is also alleged that the Committee unduly emphasised income as a criterion, a factor previously held to be irrelevant under the jurisprudence governing senior designations. The petitioner further claims that despite being recommended by a sitting judge, his own application was rejected without recording any reasons or disclosing whether the recommending judge was consulted. The petition characterises the exercise as having “prioritised wealth over merit, knowledge, and experience.”

The High Court’s notification of 90 new Senior Advocates (including five women) came after a gap of nearly three years since the last round of designations. With the latest round, the total number of Senior Advocates at the Allahabad High Court, including both the Allahabad and Lucknow Benches, reportedly exceeds 230.

By issuing notice to all 90 designated advocates, the Court has opened the door for a detailed adjudication into the validity and fairness of the designation process adopted in the November 2025 exercise.

Case Details:

Bench: Hon’ble Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Hon’ble Justice Rajeev Bharti

Date of Notice: December 10, 2025

Next Hearing: January 28, 2026
Petitioner: Anupam Mehrotra (in person)

Respondents: The 90 designated Senior Advocates; Registrar General, Allahabad High Court; and other relevant administrative authorities

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC

"Explore former Justice SN Srivastava's statement on the minority status in India, as he discusses the evolving dynamics of religious and cultural representation in the country.

TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email