38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, May 23, 2024

Petition filed in the Allahabad High Court challenges the 'Sugam Darshan' System in Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple, claims it is a 'way of collecting money'

By Tmanna      08 October, 2021 04:40 PM      0 Comments
Petition filed in the Allahabad High Court challenges the 'Sugam Darshan' System in Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple, claims it is a 'way of collecting money'

A petition has been filed in Allahabad High Court challenging the 'Sugam Darshan' system, which was launched in 2018 and allows anyone to become a 'VIP' (Very Important Person) on amount of payment for the purpose of ‘darshan' in the Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple in Banaras, Uttar Pradesh.

It states that, "this ‘queue-less’, ‘hassle-free’ Darshan system is infact nothing but a way of collecting money."

The petitioner, Gajendra Singh Yadav, a D.Phil. (Law) student at Allahabad University, states that the 'Sugam Darshan' system is not intended for Divyangs or disabled people.

He has claimed that if the Sri Kashi Vishwanath Temple trust/board was willing to provide convenience for physically disabled people, there would have been no need for payment.

He further contended that this service should be provided for free to disabled people because similar facilities are provided to disabled people/divyangs in all government or public buildings, offices, and institutions, etc. 

According to the petition, 'Sugam Darshan' costs Rs. 300.00, Rudrabhishek 'Arti' costs Rs. 450-57100, Bhog costs Rs. 180-700, Rs. 3000, Shringari costs Rs. 5000, and Lakhbilwarchana costs Rs. 8660 as stated on the official website portal of Sri Kashi Vishwanath Temple trust.

The petitioner claims that, while the system of various types of darshans has been in place at Kashi Vishwanath Temple for many years, he is drawing the court's attention to a new system of Darshan that allows anyone to become a 'VIP' (Very Important Person) for a fee and discriminates against similarly situated people with less money.

As a result, he noted that, according to the temple website, if this 'Sugam Darshan' system was created for the ease and convenience of pilgrims who come for Darshan, then creating a 'Pay Darshan' option cannot be allowed. 

The petitioner has also questioned the majority of the time the barricade around the 'Shiv Linga' in the temple. He claims that the barricade is opened on occasion, but only for a short period of time, and that the majority of the time it remains intact.

According to the petitioner, because of the barricade, devotees are forced to pour water (jal), milk (doodh), and other offerings only from above the Shiv Linga without touching it. He also claims that 'Sparsh Darshan' is only available to a select few.

The petitioner has claimed that in the worship or offering of 'Lord Shiv,' 'Sparsh Darshan' is considered to be very important and also falls under the category of 'Right to Religion' under Articles 25 and 26 of the Indian Constitution.

The petitioner has also complained about the humiliation endured by devotees. He claims that those in charge of the temple's administration push devotees out shortly after entering the 'Garbha Griha' (Sanctum Santorum).

The petitioner has further sought to draw the court's attention to the current system in which no milk or sweets are permitted from outside the temple for security reasons, and point out that shops within the temple's boundaries sell milk and sweets at significantly higher prices, such as milk worth Rs. 28 for Rs. 50-60 and sweets at Rs. 400 per kg rather than the outside rate of Rs. 280 per kg.

Alleging that known persons or relatives of persons who are members of the above Trust or Temple are given preferential treatment by granting 'darshan' out of turn to them, the petitioner further stated that this is discrimination against other devotees.

CASE – Gajendra Singh Yadav v. State of UP and Ors.

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Business
No interim relief to Forest Essentials in trademark fight against Baby Forest in Delhi HC

Delhi HC denies interim relief to Forest Essentials in trademark case against Baby Forest, citing "forest" as generic. Next hearing on July 10.

22 May, 2024 11:35 AM
Trending Business
Singapore Airlines flight SQ321 from London to Singapore drops 6000 ft within minutes, 1 dead, several injured

Singapore Airlines flight SQ321 from London to Singapore suffers 1 fatality after air dropping 6000 ft due to severe turbulence.

22 May, 2024 11:53 AM


Trending Judiciary
ED to seek court nod for custody of accused, if not arrested till cognisance of complaint: SC [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court ruled that the Enforcement Directorate must seek court approval for custody of an accused if not arrested before the court takes cognizance of a complaint.

17 May, 2024 01:38 PM
Trending Judiciary
Fundamental right to health includes consumers' right to be made aware of quality of products: SC [Read Order]

Right to health includes consumers' right to know product quality. Advertisers must submit self-declarations for ads to ensure transparency and accountability: SC

17 May, 2024 01:43 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC asks ED to file response to Soren's plea for interim on May 20

SC asks ED to file a response by May 20 to Hemant Soren's plea for interim bail during Lok Sabha elections, with a hearing scheduled for May 21.

17 May, 2024 06:12 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to EC on plea by ADR for release of voters turnout data

SC issues notice to EC on ADR plea to release voter turnout data. SC demands EC to disclose vote counts within 48 hours after each phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.

18 May, 2024 11:16 AM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email