38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, February 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Allahabad HC: Trial Courts prohibited from issuing Sec 164 CrPC Statements before taking cognisance [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      10 September, 2024 11:53 AM      0 Comments
Allahabad HC Trial Courts prohibited from issuing Sec 164 CrPC Statements before taking cognisance

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court has issued significant directions regarding the handling of statements recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) or Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

A Division Bench comprising Justices Vivek Kumar Birla and Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal made this observation while deciding a writ petition in the case of Smt Ujala And Another vs. State of UP and 3 Others.

The court noted that in numerous cases, accused persons were filing statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC while challenging FIRs under Article 226 of the Constitution. This practice was found to be contrary to Supreme Court rulings.

Highlighting the importance of maintaining the confidentiality of such statements, the court held, “This Court also strictly deprecates this practice of annexing the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 CrPC by the accused-petitioners. Further, it is of the view that concerned Magistrates/courts should not issue certified copies of the statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC, as deprecated by the Hon’ble Apex Court, to any person until cognizance is taken on the charge-sheet/police report.”

The court observed that even lower courts were issuing certified copies of statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC, which is legally impermissible.

Expressing concern over this practice, the court stated, “This Court has noticed that in a number of cases, the statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC are being filed by the accused/petitioners before this Court while challenging FIRs under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. This practice has been strictly deprecated by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Shivam (2014) 8 SCC 913, as well as in A. vs. State of U.P. and another (2020) 10 SCC 505.”

In conclusion, the court directed the Registrar General to bring this order to the attention of the Chief Justice for the potential issuance of a circular to district courts in Uttar Pradesh. It also instructed investigating officers not to supply copies of statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC or Section 183 BNSS to any person during the investigation.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC

"Explore former Justice SN Srivastava's statement on the minority status in India, as he discusses the evolving dynamics of religious and cultural representation in the country.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-notifies-2026-guidelines-for-senior-advocate-designation-scraps-point-system-and-interviews
Trending Judiciary
SC Notifies 2026 Guidelines for Senior Advocate Designation; Scraps Point System and Interviews [Read Notification]

Supreme Court notifies 2026 guidelines for Senior Advocate designation, abolishing point system and interviews; introduces holistic evaluation process.

12 February, 2026 04:00 PM
sunjay-kapur-will-dispute-priya-sachdev-files-application-to-dismiss-mil-rani-kapurs-family-trust-fraud-allegations
Trending Judiciary
Sunjay Kapur Will Dispute: Priya Sachdev Files Application To Dismiss MIL Rani Kapur’s Family Trust Fraud Allegations

Delhi HC issues notice on Priya Kapur’s plea to dismiss Rani Kapur’s suit alleging a fraudulent family trust to divert late Sunjay Kapur’s estate.

12 February, 2026 04:32 PM

TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email