38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, November 25, 2024
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Allahabad HC: Trial Courts prohibited from issuing Sec 164 CrPC Statements before taking cognisance [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      10 September, 2024 11:53 AM      0 Comments
Allahabad HC Trial Courts prohibited from issuing Sec 164 CrPC Statements before taking cognisance

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court has issued significant directions regarding the handling of statements recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) or Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

A Division Bench comprising Justices Vivek Kumar Birla and Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal made this observation while deciding a writ petition in the case of Smt Ujala And Another vs. State of UP and 3 Others.

The court noted that in numerous cases, accused persons were filing statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC while challenging FIRs under Article 226 of the Constitution. This practice was found to be contrary to Supreme Court rulings.

Highlighting the importance of maintaining the confidentiality of such statements, the court held, “This Court also strictly deprecates this practice of annexing the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 CrPC by the accused-petitioners. Further, it is of the view that concerned Magistrates/courts should not issue certified copies of the statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC, as deprecated by the Hon’ble Apex Court, to any person until cognizance is taken on the charge-sheet/police report.”

The court observed that even lower courts were issuing certified copies of statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC, which is legally impermissible.

Expressing concern over this practice, the court stated, “This Court has noticed that in a number of cases, the statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC are being filed by the accused/petitioners before this Court while challenging FIRs under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. This practice has been strictly deprecated by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Shivam (2014) 8 SCC 913, as well as in A. vs. State of U.P. and another (2020) 10 SCC 505.”

In conclusion, the court directed the Registrar General to bring this order to the attention of the Chief Justice for the potential issuance of a circular to district courts in Uttar Pradesh. It also instructed investigating officers not to supply copies of statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC or Section 183 BNSS to any person during the investigation.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC

"Explore former Justice SN Srivastava's statement on the minority status in India, as he discusses the evolving dynamics of religious and cultural representation in the country.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

supreme-court-enforces-grap-4-measures-to-combat-delhis-severe-air-pollution-warns-against-relaxation
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court enforces GRAP-4 measures to combat Delhi’s severe air pollution, warns against relaxation [Read Order]

Supreme Court enforces GRAP-4 measures in Delhi-NCR as air quality worsens, mandates strict action on pollution and stubble burning for immediate relief.

19 November, 2024 10:26 AM
cji-sanjiv-khanna-recuses-from-delhi-ridge-tree-felling-case-supreme-court-seeks-tree-restoration-updates
Trending Judiciary
CJI Sanjiv Khanna recuses from Delhi Ridge Tree Felling Case, Supreme Court seeks tree restoration updates

CJI Sanjiv Khanna recuses from Delhi Ridge tree felling case citing prior involvement; Supreme Court seeks updates on restoration and monitoring measures.

19 November, 2024 10:58 AM
supreme-court-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-mother-in-law-in-dowry-case-clarifies-stance-on-proclaimed-offenders
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court grants Anticipatory Bail to Mother in Law in Dowry Case, clarifies stance on proclaimed offenders [Read Order]

Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail in dowry case, clarifies stance on proclaimed offenders’ rights. Key legal insights from Asha Dubey vs. State of MP.

19 November, 2024 11:07 AM
sc-allows-lawyers-to-appear-virtually-amid-severe-air-pollution
Trending Judiciary
SC allows lawyers to appear virtually, amid severe air pollution

SC permits lawyers to appear virtually amid severe Delhi pollution, ensuring flexibility. CJI emphasizes no case dismissal for counsel absence.

19 November, 2024 01:52 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email