38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Allahabad High Court grants divorce after 23 years of separation, clarifies standards of marital cruelty [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      03 January, 2025 06:11 AM      0 Comments
Allahabad High Court grants divorce after 23 years of separation clarifies standards of marital cruelty

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court’s Division Bench has granted divorce in a case that includes significant observations on marital cruelty and personal autonomy in modern marriages.

Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Donadi Ramesh heard an appeal against a lower court’s dismissal of a divorce petition filed in 2001.

Allahabad HC on Marital Cruelty: Key Observations in Divorce Case

The case involved a couple married in 1990, with the husband seeking divorce on grounds of mental cruelty and desertion. The marriage produced one child in 1995, and the couple has lived separately since at least 2001.

The court notably observed that a wife’s independent behavior cannot constitute cruelty, stating: “The act of the respondent being free-willed or a person who would travel on her own or meet up with other members of civil society without forming any illegal or immoral relationship, may not be described as an act of cruelty.”

23 Years of Separation: Court Cites Supreme Court Precedent to Grant Divorce

Addressing modern marital dynamics, the court emphasized that both parties were well-educated—the husband an engineer and the wife a government teacher—stating: “Difference of perception towards life may give rise to different behaviours by individuals.”

The court found insufficient evidence to support claims of verbal insults regarding economic status or alleged immoral relationships. However, it considered the prolonged separation of 23 years and the respondent’s current unwillingness to cohabit as factors constituting grounds for divorce.

Citing recent Supreme Court precedent (Rakesh Raman Vs. Kavita, 2023), the court held that the long-term separation and sustained desertion warranted the dissolution of the marriage. No permanent alimony was ordered as both parties are employed, and their only child is now 29 years old.

For the appellant: Sri Himanshu Pandey

For the respondent: Sri Shashank Kumar

Case title: Mahendra Prasad Vs. Smt. Bindu Devi
 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC

"Explore former Justice SN Srivastava's statement on the minority status in India, as he discusses the evolving dynamics of religious and cultural representation in the country.

TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email