38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Allahabad High Court Raps Censor Board Over Dialogues and Scenes in 'Adipurush

By Harshvardhan Sharma      28 June, 2023 10:04 PM      0 Comments
Allahabad High Court Raps Censor Board Over Dialogues and Scenes in 'Adipurush

NEW DELHI: The Allahabad High Court has slammed the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for clearing the controversial film 'Adipurush' in view of its questionable dialogues and scenes out of Hindu epic 'Ramayana', by asking if this is the way to test the tolerance of the people.

A bench of Justices Rajesh Singh Chauhan and Shree Prakash Singh asked if the board understood its responsibilities.

The court was hearing two PILs, filed by social activists Kuldeep Tiwari and Bandana Kumar through advocates Ranjana Agnihotri and Sudha Sharma, contending that the film had portrayed religious characters like Lord Rama, Hanuman and others in an objectionable manner and had hurt the sentiments of the people who revered the Ramayana.

The pleas sought a direction to ban the movie.

The bench sought to know from the government counsel whether a particular religion, which was said to be tolerant, would be tested this way.

The court also slammed the CBFC, saying it seemed that the board was unable to understand its responsibilities.

Cinema is the mirror of society... What do you (Board) want to teach the future generations, the court asked the Board counsel.

On being told that certain objectionable dialogues from the movie have been removed following strong protests, the bench sought to know as what was to be done with the scenes.

The court also allowed a plea to make the films co-writer Manoj Muntashir Shukla a party in the matter.

It issued a notice to him directing him to respond within a week.

The petitioners claimed that Shuklas dialogues have portrayed the icons of the Hindu religion in a very objectionable manner and that he has sought to justify the same in the garb of creative freedom.

During the hearing, the bench said it is good that it is about a religion, the believers of which did not create any public order problem. "We should be thankful. We saw in the news that some people had gone to cinema halls and they only forced them to close the hall, they could have done something else as well," the bench said.

On being told that a disclaimer has been added in the move, the bench asked if the people who put the disclaimer consider the countrymen, and youth to be brainless.

"You show Lord Rama, Lord Laxman, Lord Hanuman, Ravana, Lanka and then say it is not Ramayana," the bench said.

"What will you do with the scenes? Seek instructions, then we will definitely do whatever we want to do...In case the exhibition of the movie is stopped, then the people whose feelings have been hurt, will get relief," the bench asked respondents counsel.

In her arguments on behalf of the petitioners, Agnihotri submitted that this was not the first time it has happened and that it had happened in movies such as PK, Mohalla Assi, Haider, etc.



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
  PREVIOUS POST
NEXT POST UCC
Related Posts
View All

Allahabad High Court Transfers Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases to Itself for Trial [Transfer Application] Allahabad High Court Transfers Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases to Itself for Trial [Transfer Application]

The Allahabad High Court has ordered the transfer of all cases related to Krishna Janmabhoomi from the Mathura court to itself. The court exercised its suo motu power for trial and allowed a transfer petition filed by Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and others. The cases involve the claim that Shahi Idgah Masjid was constructed on land belonging to the Sri Krishna Janam Bhoomi Trust and demand its removal. The court directed the District Judge, Mathura to prepare a list of similar cases for transfer. The decision raises complex questions related to the interpretation of laws and the rights of Hindu deities and devotees.

Allahabad High Court Raps Censor Board Over Dialogues and Scenes in 'Adipurush Allahabad High Court Raps Censor Board Over Dialogues and Scenes in 'Adipurush

The Allahabad High Court criticizes the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for approving the film 'Adipurush' despite objectionable dialogues and scenes from the Hindu epic 'Ramayana'. The court questions the board's understanding of its responsibilities and considers banning the movie. Social activists have filed PILs, claiming that the film has hurt religious sentiments. The court also allows a co-writer to be a party in the matter. This is not the first time such controversy has arisen in Bollywood films.

Supreme Court: No Lesser Sentence Under POCSO Act for Aggravated Sexual Assault on Children [Read Judgment] Supreme Court: No Lesser Sentence Under POCSO Act for Aggravated Sexual Assault on Children [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that courts cannot impose a lesser sentence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The decision came in response to a case where the Allahabad High Court reduced the sentence of a man convicted of aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child. The Supreme Court emphasized the lifelong impact on the victim and upheld the importance of stringent punishment for such crimes.

'Adipurush' Makers File Plea in Supreme Court Against High Court Order on Personal Appearance 'Adipurush' Makers File Plea in Supreme Court Against High Court Order on Personal Appearance

The makers of 'Adipurush' have filed a plea in the Supreme Court against the High Court's order on their personal appearance regarding objectionable content. Two PILs were filed alleging the movie's depiction of religious gods and characters, hurting public sentiments.

TRENDING NEWS

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM

TOP STORIES

bengaluru-court-convicts-ex-mp-prajwal-revanna-in-rape-case
Trending Judiciary
Bengaluru court convicts ex MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case

Bengaluru court convicts ex-MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case linked to explicit videos; one of four sexual abuse cases filed against him.

04 August, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-order-declaring-man-as-juvenile-on-basis-of-school-certificate
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside order declaring man as juvenile on basis of school certificate [Read Judgment]

SC: School certificate from private school not valid proof of age, sets aside order declaring murder accused as juvenile.

04 August, 2025 11:24 AM
hp-may-vanish-in-thin-air-god-forbid-sc-on-ecological-imbalance-in-himachal-pradesh
Trending Judiciary
‘HP may vanish in thin air, God forbid', SC on ecological imbalance in Himachal Pradesh [Read Order]

SC warns HP may vanish due to ecological imbalance; seeks state’s action plan amid rising disasters, deforestation, and climate change threats.

04 August, 2025 11:31 AM
sc-grants-4-weeks-time-to-centre-to-frame-guidelines
Trending Judiciary
SC grants 4 weeks time to Centre to frame guidelines to ensure pedestrians right to use footpath

SC gives Centre 4 weeks to frame guidelines ensuring pedestrians’ right to obstruction-free, accessible footpaths under Article 21.

04 August, 2025 11:41 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email