38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Allahabad High Court rules ‘liking’ a controversial social media post not an offense under IT Act [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      23 April, 2025 11:32 AM      0 Comments
Allahabad High Court rules liking a social media post not an offense under IT Act

Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a man booked under the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, merely for ‘liking’ a social media post that allegedly incited an unlawful assembly.

Justice Saurabh Srivastava delivered the judgment in an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking to quash the criminal case against the applicant.

The court addressed an application filed by Imran Khan, challenging the charge sheet dated 06.04.2021 and the cognizance order dated 07.02.2022 in Criminal Case No. 2961 of 2022. It was alleged that the applicant had posted provocative messages on social media, resulting in the unlawful assembly of about 600–700 persons from the Muslim community for a procession without permission.

In its key determination, the court held:
“Liking a post will not amount to publishing or transmitting the post. Therefore, merely liking a post will not attract Section 67 of the IT Act. Even otherwise, from the material on record, it appears that no provocative message is available on record.”

The court carefully examined Section 67 of the IT Act and stated:
“From a perusal of Section 67 of the IT Act, it is clear that punishment is attracted only when a person publishes, transmits, or causes to be published or transmitted in electronic form any material that tends to deprave and corrupt those who read, see, or hear such material.”

The court further clarified:
“A post or message can be said to be ‘published’ when it is posted, and ‘transmitted’ when it is shared or retweeted,” distinguishing these actions from merely liking a post.

The judgment also emphasized that:
“Section 67 of the IT Act deals with obscene material, not provocative content. The words ‘lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest’ refer to sexual interest or desire. Therefore, Section 67 does not cover provocative material.”

While noting the absence of a direct judgment on whether liking a post constitutes an offence, the court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Kaushal Kishor v. State of U.P. [(2023) 4 SCC 1], which emphasized the need for citizens to exercise restraint in speech and to use their freedom of expression responsibly under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The court found no evidence linking the applicant to any objectionable post, and the Cyber Crime Cell report confirmed no offensive content on his social media accounts.

In conclusion, the court quashed the proceedings against Imran Khan, while clarifying that the lower court is free to proceed against the other co-accused if no legal impediment exists.

Case Title: Imran Khan vs. State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant: Mr. Abhishek Ankur Chaurasia and Mr. Diwan Saifullah Khan
Counsel for State: Government Advocate

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC

"Explore former Justice SN Srivastava's statement on the minority status in India, as he discusses the evolving dynamics of religious and cultural representation in the country.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email