38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, March 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

What You Need to Know About the Babri Masjid Verdict

By Meghna Mishra      01 October, 2020 02:20 PM      0 Comments
Babri Masjid Verdict Ram Mandir

Special CBI Judge Honble Justice Surendra Kumar Yadav delivered the verdict in the much-awaited Babri Masjid demolition case today i.e., September 30th, 2020. This verdict as delivered after 28 years. almost three decades ago, the 16th Century structure of the Babri Masjid was razed by a mob in the Ayodhya town of Uttar Pradesh.

The key accused comprises of former deputy prime minister LK Advani, former Union ministers MM Joshi and Uma Bharti, and former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Kalyan Singh. However, most of these senior leaders were not physically present in the Lucknow Court but attended the proceedings via video conference.

There were a total of 32 accused persons in this case, and they were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC,1860) like criminal conspiracy under Section 120A, IPC,1860; rioting under Section 146, IPC,1860; promoting enmity between different groups under Section 153 A, IPC, 1860, and unlawful assembly under Section 141, IPC, 1860.

Justice SK Yadav began the court proceedings at around 12.30 PM and read the operative part of the verdict to state that, the demolition was not pre-planned. the judge acquitted all the accused and said, Ashok Singhal and other Sangh Parivar leaders wanted to save the structure as Ram Lalla statues were inside.

The Court could also not find any conclusive proof against the accused. It is significant to note that 351 witnesses and 600 documents as evidence was presented by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) before the CBI Court during the trial. However, Justice Yadav refused to admit the videos produced, as he held that the videos were tampered with. In a similar fashion, photographs submitted by the CBI were also not admitted on failure to produce the negatives of the same. Agreeing with the defense, the judge stated that the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 were not followed by the defense.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath welcomed the CBI special court verdict. Satyamev Jayate, he tweeted before going on to accuse the then Congress government of acting with political bias, indulging in vote bank politics and defaming BJP leaders, saints, VHP leaders, and various social organizations by lodging false cases. The people involved in the conspiracy (over Babri demolition ) should apologize to people of the country, he said. 

Brij Bhushan Singh, BJP MP from Kaisenrgank, UP welcomed the judgment by stating that, Everyone present in the court was relaxed, as all were expecting this outcome. The prosecution didn't have evidence. This is a welcome judgment. The spokesperson of VHP, Sharad Sharma that while there were no big celebrations planned, it was a big day. He also said that the accused have been acquitted finally, highlighting that it took time.

LK Advani stated that I wholeheartedly welcome the judgment by the Special Court in Babri Masjid demolition case. The judgment vindicates my personal and BJP's belief and commitment toward the Ram Janmabhoomi movement: 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-grants-bail-to-man-accused-in-ndps-case-involving-150-kg-ganja
Trending Judiciary
SC Grants Bail to Man Accused in NDPS Case Involving 150 kg Ganja [Read Order]

Supreme Court grants bail to Satyjeet Bhoi in 150 kg ganja NDPS case, directing him to cooperate with trial and follow bail conditions.

19 March, 2026 12:04 PM
delhi-hc-directs-tamil-magazine-nakkheeran-to-remove-defamatory-content-against-isha-foundation
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Directs Tamil Magazine Nakkheeran to Remove Defamatory Content Against Isha Foundation

Delhi High Court orders Nakkheeran to remove defamatory content against Isha Foundation, rejects plea to dismiss defamation suit.

19 March, 2026 03:54 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-lists-waseem-rizvis-pil-challenging-functioning-and-composition-of-up-sunni-central-waqf-board-after-four-weeks
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL Challenging Functioning and Composition of UP Sunni Central Waqf Board After Four Weeks [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL challenging the functioning and composition of the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board; Court seeks further hearing on key contention.

14 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-dismisses-mizo-chiefs-plea-seeking-compensation-for-land-acquisition-in-lushai-hills
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Mizo Chiefs’ Plea Seeking Compensation for Land Acquisition in Lushai Hills [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses Mizo Chiefs’ plea seeking compensation for alleged unlawful land acquisition in the erstwhile Lushai Hills, holding ownership over the land was not established.

14 March, 2026 12:52 PM
ordinary-matrimonial-discord-cannot-be-dressed-as-criminal-cruelty-under-section-498a-ipc-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Ordinary Matrimonial Discord Cannot Be Dressed as Criminal Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court quashes 498A IPC FIR and DV Act complaint, holding vague allegations and ordinary matrimonial discord cannot amount to criminal cruelty.

14 March, 2026 01:13 PM
sc-extends-civil-judge-application-deadline-to-april-30-amid-review-of-3-year-practice-rule
Trending Judiciary
SC Extends Civil Judge Application Deadline To April 30 Amid Review of 3 Year Practice Rule [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs High Courts to extend Civil Judge application deadlines to April 30, 2026 while reviewing the mandatory 3-year practice rule for judicial aspirants.

14 March, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email