38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 30, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

What You Need to Know About the Babri Masjid Verdict

By Meghna Mishra      01 October, 2020 02:20 PM      0 Comments
Babri Masjid Verdict Ram Mandir

Special CBI Judge Honble Justice Surendra Kumar Yadav delivered the verdict in the much-awaited Babri Masjid demolition case today i.e., September 30th, 2020. This verdict as delivered after 28 years. almost three decades ago, the 16th Century structure of the Babri Masjid was razed by a mob in the Ayodhya town of Uttar Pradesh.

The key accused comprises of former deputy prime minister LK Advani, former Union ministers MM Joshi and Uma Bharti, and former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Kalyan Singh. However, most of these senior leaders were not physically present in the Lucknow Court but attended the proceedings via video conference.

There were a total of 32 accused persons in this case, and they were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC,1860) like criminal conspiracy under Section 120A, IPC,1860; rioting under Section 146, IPC,1860; promoting enmity between different groups under Section 153 A, IPC, 1860, and unlawful assembly under Section 141, IPC, 1860.

Justice SK Yadav began the court proceedings at around 12.30 PM and read the operative part of the verdict to state that, the demolition was not pre-planned. the judge acquitted all the accused and said, Ashok Singhal and other Sangh Parivar leaders wanted to save the structure as Ram Lalla statues were inside.

The Court could also not find any conclusive proof against the accused. It is significant to note that 351 witnesses and 600 documents as evidence was presented by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) before the CBI Court during the trial. However, Justice Yadav refused to admit the videos produced, as he held that the videos were tampered with. In a similar fashion, photographs submitted by the CBI were also not admitted on failure to produce the negatives of the same. Agreeing with the defense, the judge stated that the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 were not followed by the defense.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath welcomed the CBI special court verdict. Satyamev Jayate, he tweeted before going on to accuse the then Congress government of acting with political bias, indulging in vote bank politics and defaming BJP leaders, saints, VHP leaders, and various social organizations by lodging false cases. The people involved in the conspiracy (over Babri demolition ) should apologize to people of the country, he said. 

Brij Bhushan Singh, BJP MP from Kaisenrgank, UP welcomed the judgment by stating that, Everyone present in the court was relaxed, as all were expecting this outcome. The prosecution didn't have evidence. This is a welcome judgment. The spokesperson of VHP, Sharad Sharma that while there were no big celebrations planned, it was a big day. He also said that the accused have been acquitted finally, highlighting that it took time.

LK Advani stated that I wholeheartedly welcome the judgment by the Special Court in Babri Masjid demolition case. The judgment vindicates my personal and BJP's belief and commitment toward the Ram Janmabhoomi movement: 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-holds-scst-act-provisions-not-applicable-to-caste-based-abuses-hurled-over-telephone-holds-conversation-not-in-public-view
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Holds SC/ST Act Provisions Not Applicable To Caste-Based Abuses Hurled Over Telephone, Holds Conversation Not In Public View

Calcutta High Court rules SC/ST Act not applicable to caste-based abuses over telephone, holding such conversations are not in public view.

29 December, 2025 05:13 PM
bombay-hc-holds-padma-awards-cannot-be-used-as-prefix-or-suffix-to-awardees-names
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Padma Awards Cannot Be Used as Prefix or Suffix to Awardees’ Names [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rules Padma awardees cannot use Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan or Bharat Ratna as prefixes or suffixes to their names under Article 18.

29 December, 2025 05:17 PM

TOP STORIES

bhagavad-gita-not-a-religious-text-fcra-registration-cannot-be-denied-for-teaching-gita-and-yoga-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Bhagavad Gita Not a Religious Text; FCRA Registration Cannot Be Denied for Teaching Gita and Yoga: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules Bhagavad Gita is not a religious text; FCRA registration cannot be denied to organisations teaching Gita and Yoga.

24 December, 2025 05:35 PM
two-distinct-reliefs-cannot-be-intermingled-in-a-single-writ-petition-sc
Trending Judiciary
Two Distinct Reliefs Cannot Be Intermingled in a Single Writ Petition: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that distinct reliefs cannot be combined in one writ petition, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh plea limited to one relief.

24 December, 2025 05:45 PM
income-from-sale-of-tissue-cultured-plants-constitutes-agricultural-income-exempt-from-tax-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Income from Sale of Tissue-Cultured Plants Constitutes Agricultural Income, Exempt from Tax: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules income from sale of tissue-cultured plants is agricultural income exempt from tax under the Income Tax Act.

24 December, 2025 06:05 PM
sc-steps-in-to-address-systematic-forest-land-grabbing-in-uttarakhand
Trending Judiciary
SC Steps In to Address Systematic Forest Land Grabbing in Uttarakhand [Read Order]

Supreme Court flags systematic forest land grabbing in Uttarakhand, orders inquiry, restrains private parties, and directs protection of 2,866 acres.

24 December, 2025 07:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email