38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 25, 2024
Breaking News
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bangalore Court Restrains Cure.Fit From Launching Gym.Fit In Suit Filed By Book Your Game [Read Interim Order]

By LawStreet News Network      26 August, 2019 02:00 PM      2 Comments
Bangalore Court Restrains Cure.Fit From Launching Gym.Fit In Suit Filed By Book Your Game [Read Interim Order]

BookYourGame (BYG), a marketplace to discover and book fitness centres, has been granted an ex-parte interim injunction restraining the Mukesh Bansal cofounded Cure.fit from launching its new product Gym.Fit.

The Bangalore City Civil Court passed an interim order on August 7, 2019, against Cure.Fit, ordering it to not launch, promote, market or sell any product or service using the Gym.Fit, CultX, and Sports.fit names, in any manner.

Started in 2016, BYG offers subscribers access to various gyms/fitness centres affiliated with the app without membership in each gym/fitness centre. The app also provides software management solutions for gyms and fitness centres.

Cure.Fit was set to launch a national gym subscription called Gym.Fit, which aggregates gyms across the city. BYG alleged in its petition that the health and fitness platform had offered to acquire it for about Rs 5 crore in June, but subsequently retracted after exchange of crucial data and intellectual property.

BYG submitted that the plan was for Cure.Fit to acquire the business of BYG and thereafter relaunch the same services offered by BYG as its own.

It was also submitted by BYG that it was asked to cease providing management services to its clients and terminate some of its employees on Cure.Fits insistence.

While this was the case, BYG contended that Cure.Fit abruptly intimated its unwillingness to carry forward the deal by an e-mail sent in July. Following BYG's response, Cure.Fit sent another allied e-mail in August. Through this correspondence, BYG argued that Cure.Fit also admitted to having possession of confidential information held by BYG. Further, it also contended that only a paltry compensation amount was offered for their termination of the deal.

Owing to the deal negotiations with Cure.Fit, BYG claimed to have lost a potential acquisition deal with Medifit Consultants Private Limited, Bangalore.

In this backdrop, BYG had approached the Court, contending that,

"The line of business created by the Plaintiff after having painstakingly built the same over four years is simply recreated by the Defendants using the knowledge, know-how, proprietary information and intellectual property of the plaintiff...

... The Defendants did not have any product similar to that of the Plaintiff and used theinformation, etc. and the skills, time, effort of the Plaintiff to hectically reproduce and copy the Plaintiffs product which is being hastily launched. The entire scheme of the Defendants to defraud the Plaintiff is apparent.

the Plaintiffs valuable body of work has fallen into the hands of the Defendants The Defendants are taking hasty steps to launch their own product tentatively named Gym.fit on the basis of the Plaintiffs body of work. The Defendants are also in possession of precise plans and methods to execute the business, and also a host of entities to approach to further their business. The Defendants have received huge sums of investment exceeding thousands of crores. The Defendants will indulge in anti-competitive unfair trade practices through abuse of dominance by engaging in predatory pricing etc. to immediately acquire the customers, clients, suppliers etc. of the Plaintiff and seek to monetise the very product of the Plaintiff. As such, it is imperative that the Defendants be restrained from launching a product similar to the Plaintiffs product."

While issuing the interim injunction order, the City Civil and Sessions Judge also issued notice to the Defendants and posted the matter for next hearing on September 11, 2019.

[Read Interim Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


John Doe
nomie zoe Nov 18, 2021

Great Article. Thanks for sharing

John Doe
Mathew bairstow Jan 05, 2021

sad to hear.!

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cheque-issued-for-bribe-payment-not-enforceable-under-ni-act-punjab-and-haryana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque issued for bribe payment not enforceable under NI Act: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that bribe payments do not constitute legally enforceable liabilities under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 October, 2024 10:56 AM
pune-porsche-accident-bombay-hc-rejects-anticipatory-bail-over-alleged-evidence-tampering-involving-3-lakh-bribe
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Accident: Bombay HC rejects anticipatory bail over alleged evidence tampering involving ₹3 lakh bribe [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rejects anticipatory bail in Pune Porsche accident case, citing serious evidence tampering and bribery allegations against the accused’s father.

24 October, 2024 11:07 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-for-direction-to-set-up-regulatory-board-to-monitor-and-manage-ott-platforms
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for direction to set up regulatory board to monitor & manage OTT platforms

SC dismisses plea to set up a regulatory board for OTT platforms, stating the issue falls under policy matters, not for the court to intervene.

19 October, 2024 06:22 PM
a-judges-praise-of-politician-may-affect-publics-trust-in-judiciary-sc-judge-b-r-gavai
Trending Judiciary
A judge's praise of politician may affect public's trust in judiciary: SC judge B R Gavai

SC Judge B R Gavai cautions that judges praising politicians and resigning to contest elections may erode public trust and compromise judicial impartiality.

21 October, 2024 01:34 PM
complainant-cant-insist-on-deciding-plea-to-summon-other-accused-before-cross-examination-sc
Trending Judiciary
Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules complainant can’t delay cross-examination to summon others as accused; trial court has discretion on timing under Section 319 CrPC.

21 October, 2024 01:36 PM
sc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-against-summons-in-defamation-case-on-remarks-on-pms-academic-degree
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Kejriwal's plea against summons in defamation case on remarks on PM's academic degree

SC dismisses Kejriwal’s plea challenging summons in defamation case over remarks on PM Modi’s degree, upholding Gujarat University’s complaint.

21 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email