38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bhima Koregaon Case: SC Sets Aside Bombay HC Order Refusing Extension Of Time To File Chargesheet

By LawStreet News Network      13 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Bhima Koregaon Case: SC Sets Aside Bombay HC Order Refusing Extension Of Time To File Chargesheet

The Supreme Court today (February 13, 2019) set aside the Bombay High Courts order that had refused to grant 90-days extension of time to Maharashtra Police for filing the chargesheet in the Bhima Koregaon case.

The judgment delivered by a Bench comprising of Chief Justice of IndiaRanjan Gogoi and Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and L. Nageswara Rao thereby upholds the extension of time granted to the Pune Police by the Special Court on September 2, 2018.

Further, the judgment also means that the arrested activists - Surendra Gadling, Shoma Sen, Rona Wilson, Mahesh Raut and Sudhir Dhavale will not get the benefit of 'default bail' to seek release from custody.

The matter was pertaining to a request made by the Pune Police on August 30, 2018, to Special Court in Pune to extend the detention of those detained under Section 43-D of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967.

Earlier on October 29, 2018, the Supreme Court had stayed the High Courts order which led to the detention of the accused persons and thereafter reserved its judgment on January 10, 2019.

The accused activists were arrested in connection to the event Elgar Parishad held in Pune to mark the 200th anniversary of the Bhima Koregaon battle. This event was followed by violence and clashes.

The arrested lawyers and activists were charged under the UAPA and were alleged to have links with Left-wing extremist groups.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email