38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bombay High Court refuses to halt the hearing of a PIL on COVID- 19 issues, despite SC's Suo moto cognizance on the matter

By Kartikey Garg      22 June, 2021 04:52 PM      0 Comments
 Bombay High Court refuses to halt the hearing of a PIL on COVID- 19 issues, despite SC's Suo moto cognizance on the matter

On Thursday (April 22, 2021), after the Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Centre told the court that the Supreme Court had agreed to take Suo moto cognizance of the issues related to the pandemic, the Bombay High Court said that they would continue to hear the Public Interest Litigation on COVID19 issues. 

The development occurred after ASG Anil Singh attempted to intervene by citing news reports about the Supreme Court taking Suo moto cognizance of the COVID-19 issues. 

The division bench led by Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta said that the Supreme Court has yet to stay the High Court proceedings and that the High Court will continue to hear the case until then. 

Advocate Sneha Marjadi, who was represented by advocate Arshil Shah Simil Purohit, had filed a Public Interest Litigation in the High Court. Another petitioner, Nilesh Navalakha represented by attorneys Rajesh Inamdar and Shashwat Anand had also sought the high court's help on pandemic related issues.

The delay in RT-PCR test results, the need for a doctor's prescription for government testing, and issues with hospital beds and oxygen are all listed in the petition. 

Advocates Rajesh Inamdar and Shashwat Anand have made submissions on other topics, such as providing uniform prices for the antiviral drug Remdesivir and steps to prevent black marketing. 

The Supreme Court has taken Suo moto jurisdiction over problems such as oxygen supply, medication supply, and vaccination policy in relation to the COVID19 pandemic. 

Notice to the Union of India was released accordingly by a bench consisting of Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, Justices L Nageswara Rao and S Ravindra Bhatt. To assist the court, Senior Advocate Harish Salve was named as an amicus curiae in the case. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

telangana-hc-cannot-seek-extension-beyond-45-day-limit-to-file-written-version-in-consumer-cases
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC: Cannot Seek Extension Beyond 45-Day Limit to File Written Version in Consumer Cases [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules written versions in consumer cases cannot be filed beyond the mandatory 45-day limit under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

02 January, 2026 07:13 PM
preventive-detention-cannot-be-used-to-silence-dissenting-voices-of-journalists-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Preventive Detention Cannot Be Used to Silence Dissenting Voices of Journalists: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court warns against misuse of preventive detention to silence journalists, calls it a threat to free speech and liberty.

02 January, 2026 08:04 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-earlier-aravalli-definition-judgment-lists-matter-before-vacation-bench-on-december-29
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Earlier Aravalli Definition Judgment; Lists Matter Before Vacation Bench on December 29

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Aravalli definition issue, lists matter before Vacation Bench on Dec 29, 2025, amid environmental concerns.

28 December, 2025 05:08 PM
bombay-hc-upholds-b-summary-report-dismissing-plea-to-reopen-sexual-assault-case-against-sajjan-jindal
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Upholds B-Summary Report, Dismissing Plea to Reopen Sexual Assault Case Against Sajjan Jindal [Read Order]

Bombay High Court upholds B-summary report, dismisses plea to reopen sexual assault FIR against Sajjan Jindal, citing delay, consent, and lack of merit.

29 December, 2025 05:04 PM
calcutta-hc-holds-scst-act-provisions-not-applicable-to-caste-based-abuses-hurled-over-telephone-holds-conversation-not-in-public-view
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Holds SC/ST Act Provisions Not Applicable To Caste-Based Abuses Hurled Over Telephone, Holds Conversation Not In Public View

Calcutta High Court rules SC/ST Act not applicable to caste-based abuses over telephone, holding such conversations are not in public view.

29 December, 2025 05:13 PM
bombay-hc-holds-padma-awards-cannot-be-used-as-prefix-or-suffix-to-awardees-names
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Padma Awards Cannot Be Used as Prefix or Suffix to Awardees’ Names [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rules Padma awardees cannot use Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan or Bharat Ratna as prefixes or suffixes to their names under Article 18.

29 December, 2025 05:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email