38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Calcutta High Court Orders Central Forces Deployment in Murshidabad Amid Violent Protests Against Waqf Act [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      14 April, 2025 02:12 PM      0 Comments
Calcutta High Court Orders Central Forces Deployment in Murshidabad Amid Violent Protests Against Waqf Act

Kolkata: Amid escalating communal tensions, the Calcutta High Court has ordered the deployment of Central Armed Forces in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, to restore law and order.

The court of Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury addressed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari and advocate Tarun Jyoti Tewari.

Waqf Bill Protests Turn Violent in West Bengal; Calcutta HC Steps In

The petitioners argued that, in view of the escalating violence at Jangipur and Dhuliyan between two communities, as well as other parts of West Bengal, the deployment of Central Police Forces was imperative for restoring law and order and ensuring communal harmony. This was particularly important given that the epicenter of disturbance was a border district, with violence targeting a particular community during protests against the Waqf Bill. However, the State contended that this was a politically motivated petition, as adequate steps had been taken by the administration to secure citizens’ lives and property, with 138 arrests made so far. Six companies of the BSF had already been deployed at the District Magistrate’s request, working under the local police’s direction, and the Chief Minister had made a public appeal for peace and harmony.

Central Forces Deployed in Murshidabad to Control Communal Clashes

The court noted, “It is undeniable that there have been frequent instances of violence between communities in different parts of the State of West Bengal, and the disquieting situation prevailing until today cannot be ignored.”

Expressing concern about the adequacy of state measures, the court observed, “Although we have noted the State’s stand that it is making an endeavor to ensure peaceful co-existence of different communities, the measures so far taken do not appear to be adequate. The situation is grave and volatile.”

The court highlighted its constitutional duty, stating, “Constitutional Courts cannot be mute spectators and embroil themselves in technical defenses when the safety and security of the people are in danger. The deployment of Central Armed Forces earlier could have de-escalated the situation, as it appears adequate measures have not been taken in time.”

In its directive, the court ordered, “We direct the deployment of Central Armed Forces in the district of Murshidabad, who shall operate in the district in cooperation with the civil administration so that the situation that has necessitated the deployment of the armed forces is effectively dealt with and normalcy is restored.”

The court further stipulated that the deployment should not be limited to Murshidabad but should extend to other affected districts as necessary, noting that incidents had also been reported in “Amtala (South 24 Parganas), North 24 Parganas, Champdani (Hooghly), Dhuliyan, and Jangipur (Murshidabad), and even parts of Kolkata.”

The interim arrangement will continue until April 17, 2025, with the state directed to file a comprehensive report on steps taken pursuant to the court’s order.

Mr. Soumya Majumder, Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Senior Advocates, Mr. Kaustav Bagchi, Mr. Anish Kr. Mukherjee, and Mr. Suryaneel Das, Advocates, appeared for the petitioners, while Mr. Kalyan Bandyopadhyay, Senior Advocate, Mr. Anirban Ray, Ld. GP, Mr. Debangshu Dinda, and Mr. Arka Kumar Nag, Advocates, appeared for the State of West Bengal. Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharjee and Mr. Siddhartha Lahiri, Advocates, appeared for the Union of India.

Case Title: Sri Suvendu Adhikari & Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Birbhum Massacre: NHRC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance, Directs State Gov To Submit Detailed Report Within 4 Weeks Birbhum Massacre: NHRC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance, Directs State Gov To Submit Detailed Report Within 4 Weeks

According to reports, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday met the families of the victims and announced Rs 2 lakh compensation for rebuilding the scorched homes. Promising jobs to ten families affected by the violence, Banerjee added that she would ensure "speedy justice".

Supreme Court Rejects West Bengal's Plea Against CBI Probe in Linked Municipality and Teachers' Recruitment Scam Supreme Court Rejects West Bengal's Plea Against CBI Probe in Linked Municipality and Teachers' Recruitment Scam

Supreme Court dismisses West Bengal's plea against CBI probe into municipality recruitment scam linked with teachers' recruitment irregularities. Abhishek Banerjee, TMC MP, faces setback as court refuses interference.

Calcutta High Court conducts late-evening hearing, orders release of lawyer arrested inside court [Read Order] Calcutta High Court conducts late-evening hearing, orders release of lawyer arrested inside court [Read Order]

After holding a late-evening hearing due to unprecedented events, a division bench of the Calcutta High Court stayed an order which directed a lawyers arrest inside the court on charges of contempt of court.

Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6] Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6]

A weekly round-up of the top stories from the Supreme Court of India and High Courts across the country summed up in a 3-minute read.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM
limitation-for-continuous-breach-runs-only-till-contract-expiry-kerala-hc-clarifies
Trending Judiciary
Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.

30 October, 2025 01:37 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM
ngt-orders-probe-into-illegal-tree-felling-in-delhis-civil-lines-directs-action-within-three-months
Trending Environment
NGT Orders Probe into Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines, Directs Action Within Three Months [Read Order]

NGT directs Tree Officer to probe illegal tree felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines and take action under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.

25 October, 2025 11:28 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-fir-against-cnn-news18-anchor-akansha-swarup-over-kamakhya-temple-remarks
Trending CelebStreet
Gauhati HC Quashes FIR Against CNN-News18 Anchor Akansha Swarup Over Kamakhya Temple Remarks [Read Order]

Gauhati HC quashes FIR against CNN-News18 anchor Akansha Swarup, ruling her Kamakhya Temple remarks were careless but lacked malicious intent.

25 October, 2025 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-upholds-divorce-on-cruelty-grounds-denies-alimony-to-financially-independent-wife
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Divorce On Cruelty Grounds, Denies Alimony To Financially Independent Wife [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds divorce on cruelty grounds, denies alimony to IRTS officer wife, ruling that alimony is for need-based justice, not enrichment.

25 October, 2025 12:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email