38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 18, 2024

'A Caretaker/ Servant Can Never Acquire Interest in Property Irrespective of his Long Possession': Supreme Court [READ ORDER]

By Nargis Bano      22 September, 2021 12:25 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court recently ruled that a caretaker

The Supreme Court recently ruled that a caretaker/servant can never acquire an interest in the property, regardless of how long he has been in possession.

In this case, the plaintiff sought a declaration that he is a lawful occupier as the sole owner's caretaker/servant of the suit property. He also sought a permanent injunction prohibiting the defendant from disturbing or evicting him from the suit property.

To this, the defendant filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking the dismissal of the plaint on the grounds that suit proceedings at the instance of the caretaker/servant are unconstitutional because he acquired no interest in the subject property despite his long possession. The Trial Court denied this application, and the High Court upheld the order.

In an appeal, the bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka disagreed, observing:

"After hearing counsel for the parties and considering the material on record, we concluded that the Trail Court made a clear error in appreciating the pleadings on record from the plaint filed at the instance of respondent no.1-plaintiff, who as a caretaker/servant can never acquire an interest in the property regardless of his long possession and the caretaker/servant can never acquire an interest in the property regardless of his long possession and the caretaker/servant can never acquire an interest in the property."

Allowing the appeal, the court dismissed the plaint, concluding that the current proceeding is not legal under first principles.



Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Know The Law
Zero FIR: Here’s all you need to know!

Understanding Zero FIR: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 154 allows FIR at any police station. E-FIR under Section 173 ensures efficient crime reporting in India.

17 July, 2024 01:25 PM
Trending Judiciary
Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay asks SC to declare amendment to Preamble as unconstitutional

Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay petitions SC to declare the 42nd Amendment to the Preamble, which added "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity," as unconstitutional.

17 July, 2024 05:14 PM


Trending Judiciary
Bombay High Court denies interim relief in plea against 1 year Pan Masala Ban [Read Order]

Bombay High Court denies interim relief to petitioners challenging the 1-year ban on pan masala, citing arguable questions and ongoing similar cases.

12 July, 2024 10:00 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC Collegium recommends appointment of Chief Justices of eight High Courts [Read Order]

SC Collegium recommends appointments of Chief Justices for Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, and Meghalaya High Courts.

12 July, 2024 10:55 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC orders interim bail for Kejriwal in ED case, refers issues on arrest to larger bench

SC grants interim bail to Kejriwal in ED case, refers arrest issues to larger bench; AAP leader remains in jail due to separate CBI arrest in liquor scam.

12 July, 2024 11:21 AM
Trending Judiciary
Hathras incident: SC refuses to consider PIL on inquiry, adequate compensation

Supreme Court declines PIL on Hathras stampede inquiry and compensation, directs petitioner to approach High Court for addressing the issue.

12 July, 2024 01:38 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email