38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Carry bags printed with store logo and name must be given free of cost to customers: District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission II, Hyderabad [READ ORDER]

By Mathews Savio      23 February, 2021 07:04 PM      0 Comments
Carry bags printed with store logo and name must be given free of cost to customers: District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission  II, Hyderabad [READ ORDER]

In deciding a complaint filed by a 21 years old student, Baglekar Akash Kumar, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission II, Hyderabad ordered the opponent supermarket to provide the carry bags which contain the store name and logo free of cost to all customer.

The complainant made a purchase at the store of the opposing-party in June 2019, the bill amount charged by the store included Rs. 3 for the plastic carry bags provided. The bag had the name and logo of the supermarket.

The complainant, as party-in-person, argued that charging a price for the carry bags on which the stores name and logo are printed amounts to using the customers as advertisement agents at the cost of the consumer himself. Such a practice was argued to amount to an Unfair-trade practice under Section -2 (1) (r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

A similar case decided by the Chandigarh Consumer Court where Bata company was asked not to use its customers as advertisement agents were quoted by the complainant to support his argument.

The opposing-party, the supermarket, on its part argued that the complainant had a choice to buy or not to buy the carry bag and was in no way forced by the store. Further, it was argued that the store was facilitating the consumer by providing them with quality plastic carry bags meeting the necessary standards in compliance with the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2011 as amended in 2018. There was no restriction imposed on the consumer from bringing his carry bag. 

The counsel arguing for the Super-market contented that the demand for payment for providing plastic bags is a mandate on the store under the Plastic Management Waste Management (Amendment) Rules, 2018. The practice embodies the 'polluter-pays' principle by making the customer pay if he is not taking the responsibility of bringing reusable bags. It aims to discourage the indiscriminate use of plastic bags. The store in its part is actively encouraging the customers to carry with them reusable bags by prominently displaying signs in the store to that effect.

The complainant was argued to be attempting to harassing the opposite party by bringing false claims of material loss, damage, mental agony and physical hardship. 

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission after hearing both sides held that the practice of charging the customers at the cash counter for the carry bags without display of its price and specification affects the consumers right to make an informed choice. The Commission also held that charging the customers for the carry bags containing store logo and name amounts to unfair trade practice as the customer is used as a tool for advertising without his consent and at his own expense.

The Commission in its order directed the store to give free carry bags to all customers if printed with the store logo and name. Also, to pay back the Rs. 3 charged from the complainant along with Rs. 15,000 as compensation for being used as an advertising tool and Rs. 1500 as cost of the proceeding.

The Commission in its order also made it clear that stores can charge for the plastic carry bags if it does not contain the store name and logo. 

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

a-new-dawn-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-replacing-colonial-shackles-with-indigenous-legal-reforms
Trending Vantage Points
A New Dawn in India’s Criminal Justice System: Replacing Colonial Shackles with Indigenous Legal Reforms

This research paper examines India’s transition from IPC, CrPC, and IEA to BNS, BNSS, and BSA, emphasizing victim-centric and technology-driven justice reforms.

30 July, 2025 12:41 PM
your-conduct-does-not-inspire-confidence-sc-reserves-judgment-on-justice-yashwant-varmas-plea
Trending Judiciary
‘Your Conduct Does Not Inspire Confidence’: SC Reserves Judgment on Justice Yashwant Varma’s Plea

CJI can recommend removal of a judge in cases of grave misconduct, SC says; clarifies CJI isn’t a mere post office & Parliament has final say.

30 July, 2025 04:14 PM

TOP STORIES

allegations-against-rahul-gandhi-indicated-deliberate-spreading-of-hatred-up-govt-tells-sc
Trending Executive
Allegations against Rahul Gandhi indicated deliberate spreading of hatred, UP govt tells SC

UP govt tells SC that Rahul Gandhi’s Savarkar remarks show deliberate hate-mongering; supports summons citing prima facie case under Sections 153A & 505 IPC.

25 July, 2025 01:45 PM
sc-raps-ktka-hc-on-manner-of-granting-bail-to-actor-darshan-in-murder-case
Trending CelebStreet
SC raps Ktka HC on manner of granting bail to actor Darshan in murder case

SC slams Karnataka HC for granting bail to actor Darshan in murder case, calls reasoning flawed and akin to acquittal; reserves order on state’s plea.

25 July, 2025 01:49 PM
sc-to-examine-inordinate-delay-in-judges-appointments
Trending Judiciary
SC to examine inordinate delay in judges appointments

SC to examine Centre’s delay in appointing judges despite Collegium reiteration; pleas allege 4-year lag affects judicial seniority and interest.

25 July, 2025 02:50 PM
sc-refuses-stay-on-udaipur-files-tells-petitioners-to-approach-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses stay on 'Udaipur Files'; tells petitioners to approach Delhi HC

SC refuses to stay ‘Udaipur Files’ release; asks petitioners to approach Delhi HC over certification, says no views expressed on film’s merits.

25 July, 2025 03:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email