38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, January 29, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Karnataka HC Asks Petitioner to Explain Email containing warning to Discovery Channel against airing the Cauvery Calling Project Documentary [READ ORDER]

By Saransh Awasthi      14 September, 2020 11:05 AM      0 Comments
Cauvery Calling Discovery Channel

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday (September 8, 2020) has sought an explanation from petitioner A.V. Amarnathan as to on what authority he sent an email to Discovery channel threatening it that airing any program on the 'Cauvery Calling' project would amount to contempt of Court.

A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Ashok S Kinagi while issuing the directions said that, "The petitioner claims to be a pro bono litigant. Making such representation to a television channel may raise a question whether the petitioner is really a pro bono litigant. The petitioner cannot threaten a television channel with contempt on the ground that if they telecast a program on the respondents, it will amount to contempt."

The direction was issued after a complaint was filed before the court by the ISHA Outreach, which manages the Cauvery Calling. The complaint said that the petitioner on August 21 sent an email to Discovery channel warning that telecasting the documentary, scheduled to be aired on August 22 at 6.30 p.m., would amount to contempt of court as the legality of the project is sub judice.

On the last hearing, the court asked the petitioner whether he has sent a legal notice to the channel or not, following which an affidavit in reply was filed by the petitioner. 

The Court today, after perusing the affidavit, said that "In the affidavit dated 5th September 2020 and in paragraph No.7, the petitioner has justified the action of informing the discovery channel that airing the program will amount to contempt. The petitioner appearing in person owes an explanation to the Court for this conduct."

A.V. Amarnathan, a city-based advocate filed a PIL before the High Court seeking directions to ISHA foundation to not collect funds from the public for the Cauvery Calling project. As per the petition, the foundation has a target of planting 253 crore saplings on the Cauvery basin, however, the same will be done by collecting a donation of Rs. 42 per sapling from the public donor. The petition states that the collection of money from the public is disturbing since the expected amount of donation is around Rs. 10K crore. 

"Foundation claims that it has conducted studies regarding the Cauvery Basin. But it ought to have submitted the said report to the State. And the state after deliberating the said studies should have given approval. But no such process is carried out. The petitioner submits that no private organization can be permitted to carry out any work, on the Government land, without there being a proper approval from the state", the plea states.

Earlier this year, the Court had asked Isha Foundation to disclose the amount it has collected for the 'Cauvery Calling Project. It was later informed to the Court that the project was being dealt with by ISHA Outreach under the ISHA Foundation.

The Honble High Court has directed the petitioner to file an affidavit stating whether he wants to justify the threat given to the television channel, within one week. The matter has been posted for the next hearing on September 24.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

vande-mataram-at-150-constitutional-reverence-judicial-restraint-and-the-limits-of-legal-nationalism
Trending Know The Law
Vande Mataram at 150: Constitutional Reverence, Judicial Restraint, and the Limits of Legal Nationalism

At 150, Vande Mataram’s constitutional status, judicial restraint, and the limits of legal nationalism reveal India’s unresolved debate on law and reverence.

28 January, 2026 12:19 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-family-pension-for-remarried-childless-widow-of-crpf-personnel-parents-not-entitled
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Family Pension for Remarried Childless Widow of CRPF Personnel; Parents Not Entitled [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court rules that a remarried childless widow of a CRPF personnel remains entitled to family pension; dependent parents have no claim under Rule 54.

28 January, 2026 03:56 PM

TOP STORIES

national-green-tribunal-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-techies-drowning-in-waterlogged-trench
Trending Environment
National Green Tribunal Takes Suo Motu Cognisance Of Techie’s Drowning In Waterlogged Trench [Read Order]

National Green Tribunal takes suo motu cognisance of a techie’s drowning in a waterlogged trench in Noida, citing environmental lapses and violation of law.

23 January, 2026 03:20 PM
vande-mataram-at-150-constitutional-reverence-judicial-restraint-and-the-limits-of-legal-nationalism
Trending Know The Law
Vande Mataram at 150: Constitutional Reverence, Judicial Restraint, and the Limits of Legal Nationalism

At 150, Vande Mataram’s constitutional status, judicial restraint, and the limits of legal nationalism reveal India’s unresolved debate on law and reverence.

28 January, 2026 12:19 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-family-pension-for-remarried-childless-widow-of-crpf-personnel-parents-not-entitled
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Family Pension for Remarried Childless Widow of CRPF Personnel; Parents Not Entitled [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court rules that a remarried childless widow of a CRPF personnel remains entitled to family pension; dependent parents have no claim under Rule 54.

28 January, 2026 03:56 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email