38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Karnataka HC Asks Petitioner to Explain Email containing warning to Discovery Channel against airing the Cauvery Calling Project Documentary [READ ORDER]

By Saransh Awasthi      14 September, 2020 11:05 AM      0 Comments
Cauvery Calling Discovery Channel

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday (September 8, 2020) has sought an explanation from petitioner A.V. Amarnathan as to on what authority he sent an email to Discovery channel threatening it that airing any program on the 'Cauvery Calling' project would amount to contempt of Court.

A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Ashok S Kinagi while issuing the directions said that, "The petitioner claims to be a pro bono litigant. Making such representation to a television channel may raise a question whether the petitioner is really a pro bono litigant. The petitioner cannot threaten a television channel with contempt on the ground that if they telecast a program on the respondents, it will amount to contempt."

The direction was issued after a complaint was filed before the court by the ISHA Outreach, which manages the Cauvery Calling. The complaint said that the petitioner on August 21 sent an email to Discovery channel warning that telecasting the documentary, scheduled to be aired on August 22 at 6.30 p.m., would amount to contempt of court as the legality of the project is sub judice.

On the last hearing, the court asked the petitioner whether he has sent a legal notice to the channel or not, following which an affidavit in reply was filed by the petitioner. 

The Court today, after perusing the affidavit, said that "In the affidavit dated 5th September 2020 and in paragraph No.7, the petitioner has justified the action of informing the discovery channel that airing the program will amount to contempt. The petitioner appearing in person owes an explanation to the Court for this conduct."

A.V. Amarnathan, a city-based advocate filed a PIL before the High Court seeking directions to ISHA foundation to not collect funds from the public for the Cauvery Calling project. As per the petition, the foundation has a target of planting 253 crore saplings on the Cauvery basin, however, the same will be done by collecting a donation of Rs. 42 per sapling from the public donor. The petition states that the collection of money from the public is disturbing since the expected amount of donation is around Rs. 10K crore. 

"Foundation claims that it has conducted studies regarding the Cauvery Basin. But it ought to have submitted the said report to the State. And the state after deliberating the said studies should have given approval. But no such process is carried out. The petitioner submits that no private organization can be permitted to carry out any work, on the Government land, without there being a proper approval from the state", the plea states.

Earlier this year, the Court had asked Isha Foundation to disclose the amount it has collected for the 'Cauvery Calling Project. It was later informed to the Court that the project was being dealt with by ISHA Outreach under the ISHA Foundation.

The Honble High Court has directed the petitioner to file an affidavit stating whether he wants to justify the threat given to the television channel, within one week. The matter has been posted for the next hearing on September 24.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-directs-ms-dhoni-to-pay-10-lakh-for-transcription-of-cds-in-defamation-suit
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Directs MS Dhoni to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Transcription of CDs in Defamation Suit [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs MS Dhoni to pay ₹10 lakh for transcription and translation of CDs in his defamation suit against Zee Media.

13 February, 2026 02:36 PM
sc-holds-successive-fir-registration-to-keep-accused-in-custody-is-abuse-of-process-grants-bail-under-article-32
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Successive FIR Registration to Keep Accused in Custody Is Abuse of Process; Grants Bail Under Article 32 [Read Order]

Supreme Court calls successive FIRs to keep accused in custody an abuse of process, grants bail under Article 32 in Jharkhand case.

13 February, 2026 02:48 PM
sc-holds-post-arbitral-award-transferee-cannot-resist-execution-reaffirms-lis-pendens-doctrine-applies-to-money-decrees
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Post-Arbitral Award Transferee Cannot Resist Execution; Reaffirms Lis Pendens Doctrine Applies to Money Decrees [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules post-arbitral award purchasers can’t block execution; lis pendens applies to money decrees under Transfer of Property Act.

13 February, 2026 02:59 PM
sc-holds-anticipatory-bail-has-no-time-limit-protection-continues-after-chargesheet
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Anticipatory Bail Has No Time Limit, Protection Continues After Chargesheet [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules anticipatory bail has no time limit, continues after chargesheet, and High Courts can’t restrict protection to investigation stage.

13 February, 2026 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email