38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Coal Scam Case Update: SC Declines To Stay The Investigation Of CBI

By LawStreet News Network      10 February, 2020 10:02 PM      0 Comments
Coal Scam Case Update: SC Declines To Stay The Investigation Of CBI

The Supreme Court declined to grant a stay on the investigation which is being administered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into the alleged embroilment of some officials from the Office of Prime Minister (PMO) in the Coal Scam case against Jindal Steel. Jindal Steel was stewarded by Advocate Jayant Mohan in fresh (for admission) in criminal cases heard by the Chief Justice S.A Bobde, Justices B.R Gavi and Surya Kant.

In the year of 2015, there was a criticism made by a Special Court to the of Prime Minister during the regime of United Progressive Alliance (UPA) mentioning that it didn't appear the functioning of PMO was satisfactory in the allocation of coal block. The observation was related to the case of Nagpur based Grace Industries Limited (GIL) in which it directed the CBI to probe into the involvement of public officials and officials from the company. The CBI Special Judge said, "In these circumstances, I am constrained to observe that even the working of the officers of PMO also does not appear to be above board. When there was a specific observation by the Minister of State for Coal (Rao) regarding the case of M/s GIL, then at least the officers in PMO ought to have highlighted the said fact before the file  submitted to the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who was holding the position of Coal Minister at that time. The forty-page order mentions the obvious extent to which Ministry of Coal (MOC) officers went into, to favour private parties to allocate coal blocks. The Charge-sheet which was filed by CBI involved GIL and one of its director, Mukesh Gupta as the accused under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

The Supreme Court had given 10th February as the final date to decide the  case. A Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) conducted trials for the Enforcement Directorate in the money laundering case which is related to Coal scam and the plea was submitted before the bench by Advocate R S Cheema. The Solicitor General Tushar Mehta suggested the name of former Additional Solicitor-General Maninder Singh as the new SPP but the bench consisting of Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justice Deepak Gupta weren't in agreement to his suggestion.

 

Author: Asif Iqbal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM

TOP STORIES

hit-and-run-accident-case-sc-transfers-trial-involving-judicial-officer-from-punjab-to-delhi
Trending Judiciary
Hit-and-run accident case: SC transfers trial involving judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi

SC shifts hit-and-run case involving probationer judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi over alleged bias; orders potential further probe by Delhi Police.

31 October, 2025 11:27 AM
sc-issues-stern-warning-to-state-bar-councils-over-excessive-enrolment-fees-threatens-contempt-action
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Stern Warning To State Bar Councils Over Excessive Enrolment Fees, Threatens Contempt Action [Read Order]

SC warns State Bar Councils to stop charging over ₹750 enrollment fee or face contempt; directs BCI to issue circular, return applicants’ documents immediately.

31 October, 2025 11:32 AM
lawyers-cant-be-summoned-for-legal-advice-unless-covered-under-exceptions-of-sec-132-bsa-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers can't be summoned for legal advice unless covered under exceptions of Sec 132 BSA: SC

Supreme Court rules lawyers cannot be summoned for legal advice unless exceptions under Sec 132 BSA apply, safeguarding lawyer-client privilege and legal profession autonomy.

31 October, 2025 02:29 PM
conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email