38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Collegium approves transfer of seven judges [Read Statement]

By LawStreet News Network      25 November, 2022 04:57 PM      0 Comments
Collegium approves transfer of seven judges

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Collegium headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, in its first meetings, on Thursday approved transfer of seven judges of the High Courts.

It also recommended for elevation of two advocates and six judicial officers as judges of the Rajasthan High Court.

In the list of judges recommended for transfer, the name of Gujarat High Court judge, Justice Nikhil Kariel, whose reported shifting ignited protests among lawyers in the High Court, was missing.

The transfer list, however, included name of Telangana High Court judge, Justice A Abhishek Reddy. The news about his transfer was also met with protest by lawyers in Telangana High Court.

In its meeting held on Thursday, the Collegium recommended for transfer of Justice Ms V M Velumani from Madras to Calcutta High Court, Justice Battu Devanand from Andhra Pradesh to Madras High Court, Justice D Ramesh from Andhra Pradesh to Allahabad High Court, Justice Mrs Lalitha Kanneganti from Telangana to Karnataka High Court, Justice Dr D Nagarjun from Telangana to Madras High Court, Justice T Raja from Madras to Rajasthan High Court and Justice A Abhishek Reddy from Telangana to Patna High Court.

The Collegium also recommended for elevation of advocates Anil Kumar Upman, Smt Nupur Bhati as judges in the Rajasthan High.

In other decisions, the Collegium also approved elevation of judicial officers Rajendra Prakash Soni, Ashok Kumar Jain, Yogendra Kumar Purohit, Bhuwan Goyal, Praveer Bhatnagar, and Ashutosh Kumar as judges of the Rajasthan High Court.

In yet another decision, the Collegium also recommended for making two additional judges as permanent judges of Chhattisgarh High Court namely Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, and Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi.

Read Statement 1

Read Statement 2

Read Statement 3

Read Statement 4



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email