38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Delayed investigations do not reflect a good image about the investigating agency': Calcutta HC takes Suo Moto cognizance on delayed investigation in criminal cases. [READ ORDER]

By Athira Nair      14 June, 2021 06:18 PM      0 Comments
'Delayed investigations do not reflect a good image about the investigating agency': Calcutta HC takes Suo Moto cognizance on delayed investigation in criminal cases. [READ ORDER]

The Calcutta HC on 9th June, 2021, Wednesday, took Suo Moto cognizance regarding delayed investigation in criminal cases.

The bench comprised of Acting Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Arijit Banerjee. They noted that according to the information received, there are a total of 999 cases where the charge sheet had not been filed within the time permitted. Some of the cases are over a decade old.

Summary of the matter:

In the view of an order dated 29th January, 2021, passed by the Jalpaiguri Bench, there was information passed on from the Criminal Investigation Department of the State of West Bengal, which was duly placed before the Chief Justice (Acting), and the matter was thereby decided to be viewed on the Judicial side as a PIL, because these delayed investigations do not reflect good on the investigating agency.

The Court observed the following are the reasons for non-filing of the charge sheets within the pertained time:

  • Pendency of the investigation 
  • Non-receipt of reports from different laboratories 
  • The approval for prosecution
  • The procedure and time period for the arrest 
  • Experts opinion 
  • Availability of the required documents.

In the ambit of the aforementioned facts, the Court asked Kishore Datta, the Advocate General to go through the information received from the Criminal Investigation Department of the State of West Bengal and to apprise the Court as to whether there are any other cases where charge sheets have not been filed within the time permitted.

The Court observed that the infrastructure is essential to be update or augmented, therefore a plan should be placed before the Court.

Further, the director general of the Court was directed to collect information from all the Courts in the State of West Bengal as regards to the cases.

The next hearing is adjourned to June 28th 2021.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email