38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Delayed investigations do not reflect a good image about the investigating agency': Calcutta HC takes Suo Moto cognizance on delayed investigation in criminal cases. [READ ORDER]

By Athira Nair      14 June, 2021 06:18 PM      0 Comments
'Delayed investigations do not reflect a good image about the investigating agency': Calcutta HC takes Suo Moto cognizance on delayed investigation in criminal cases. [READ ORDER]

The Calcutta HC on 9th June, 2021, Wednesday, took Suo Moto cognizance regarding delayed investigation in criminal cases.

The bench comprised of Acting Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Arijit Banerjee. They noted that according to the information received, there are a total of 999 cases where the charge sheet had not been filed within the time permitted. Some of the cases are over a decade old.

Summary of the matter:

In the view of an order dated 29th January, 2021, passed by the Jalpaiguri Bench, there was information passed on from the Criminal Investigation Department of the State of West Bengal, which was duly placed before the Chief Justice (Acting), and the matter was thereby decided to be viewed on the Judicial side as a PIL, because these delayed investigations do not reflect good on the investigating agency.

The Court observed the following are the reasons for non-filing of the charge sheets within the pertained time:

  • Pendency of the investigation 
  • Non-receipt of reports from different laboratories 
  • The approval for prosecution
  • The procedure and time period for the arrest 
  • Experts opinion 
  • Availability of the required documents.

In the ambit of the aforementioned facts, the Court asked Kishore Datta, the Advocate General to go through the information received from the Criminal Investigation Department of the State of West Bengal and to apprise the Court as to whether there are any other cases where charge sheets have not been filed within the time permitted.

The Court observed that the infrastructure is essential to be update or augmented, therefore a plan should be placed before the Court.

Further, the director general of the Court was directed to collect information from all the Courts in the State of West Bengal as regards to the cases.

The next hearing is adjourned to June 28th 2021.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email