38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi Court Grants Bail To 66-Year-Old Man accused in Delhi Riots, Says 'Police Not Serious About His Alleged Involvement in The Matter' [READ ORDER]

By Arundhuti Deshmukh      30 October, 2020 06:30 PM      0 Comments
Delhi Court Grants Bail To 66-Year-Old Man accused in Delhi Riots, Says 'Police Not Serious About His Alleged Involvement in The Matter' [READ ORDER]

New Delhi, Oct 28: A Delhi court on Wednesday (October 28, 2020) granted anticipatory bail to a 66-year-old man in a case of vandalism of a shop during the northeast Delhi riots in February, saying the police was not serious about his alleged involvement in the matter.

Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav granted anticipatory bail to Uday Singh and directed him to appear before the investigating officer on October 30.

The court also directed Singh to continue to cooperate in the investigation and said the police should give one-week clear notice to him in case of arrest.

It said, though, Singh can be seen in the alleged video of the incident, he did not appear to be participating in the riots in the Khajuri Khas area.

The material on record is really short about the authenticity of viral video, it said in its order. It further noted that there has been previous discord between the complainant, Yakub, and Singh with regard to payment of rent/electricity charges of the shop.

Yakub had rented the shop owned by Singh. The applicant (Singh) is a permanent resident of Karawal Nagar, Delhi. He is not a previous convict. The earlier anticipatory bail application of the applicant was probably dismissed without considering the material in the charge sheet," the court said.

It is also evident that even the police is not serious about the involvement of the applicant in the present case, as the incident allegedly took place on February 24, 2020, and the NBWs (non-bailable warrants) against the applicant have been obtained from the court on October 14, 2020, when the anticipatory bail of co-accused Darshan was pending, which was ultimately granted on October 21, 2020, the court said.

The court had earlier dismissed his anticipatory bail plea in July in the case. Singh''s counsel had told the court that he was not armed and merely standing in front of his residence during the riots.

His lawyer claimed that Singh has been receiving phone calls from the police allegedly threatening to arrest him in the matter and in this regard they have also visited his house several times.

Special Public Prosecutor Jinendra Jain, appearing for the police, opposed the anticipatory bail plea saying Singh was absconding and his NBWs have been issued by the court. Communal clashes had broken out in northeast Delhi on February 24 after violence between citizenship law supporters and protesters spiraled out of control leaving at least 53 people dead and around 200 injured.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email