38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi Court Grants Bail to Malaysians From Tablighi Jamaat Congregation

By Manthan Pandit      08 July, 2020 05:19 PM      0 Comments
Delhi Court Grants Bail to Malaysians From Tablighi Jamaat Congregation

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Saket Court granted bail to 122 Malaysian nationals affiliated with the Tablighi Jamaat case who were charged with violating visa conditions and government regulations for curbing COVID19 spread.

CMM Gurmohina Kaur issued bail to all Malaysian nationals after furnishing a personal bond of approximately 10,000 each and forwarded to Metropolitan Magistrate Siddharth Malik their request for an early hearing plea bargaining.

Pursuant to section 3 of the Epidemics Diseases Act, sections 51 and 58 of the Disaster Management Act, and sections 188, 269, 270, 271, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, the charge was lodged against the above-mentioned foreign nationals.

It is also claimed that section 14(b) of the Foreigners Act and sections 304, 308 and 336 of the IPC have been additionally attached to the charge sheet during the investigation. 

In the previous trial, by finding that there is a prima facie case to proceed against the aforementioned foreign nationals under the provisions cited in the charge sheet, the court had taken cognizance of the charge sheet.

The court said: There is prima facie sufficient material on record to proceed against the accused persons u/s 14(b) Foreigners Act, 1946 r/w section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, r/w section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, r/w section 188, 269, 270, 271 IPC who have been mentioned in column no. 11 of the charge sheet. Accordingly, cognizance of the offenses u/s 14(b) Foreigners Act, 1946 r/w section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, r/w section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, r/w section 188/269/270/271 IPC is hereby taken.

During the proceedings, which was conducted through video conferencing, the court observed that: At this stage, it is seen that 48 charge sheets and 11 supplementary charge sheets have been filed in the present FIR country wise by the IO depending upon the nationality of the accused persons. Further, in view of the guidelines and suggestions given by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide order dated 01.07.2020, let the accused persons be summoned in the following manner.

At present, these foreign nationals are residing at their own expense in accommodations of their choice.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email