38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi Court summons Sudarshan news MD Suresh Chavhanke and others in defamation case [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      24 October, 2024 10:48 AM      0 Comments
Delhi Court summons Sudarshan news MD Suresh Chavhanke and others in defamation case

New Delhi: A Delhi court recently summoned Sudarshan TV Channel and six others, including Sudarshan News’ chairman and managing director (CMD), Suresh Chavhanke, in a defamation case. The defamation complaint was filed by Mohd Tufail Khan, who runs an NGO and a madrasa named Jamia Arabia Nizami Welfare Educational Society. Khan stated that his society provides shelter, food, and education to about 70 orphans.

Metropolitan Magistrate Kartik Taparia of Saket Court made important observations while issuing summons under Sections 500/501 of the Indian Penal Code. The court observed, “From the material placed on record and the pre-summoning evidence led by the complainant, it prima facie appears that the tweet published by accused No. 1, the act of accused No. 2 by calling the complainant ‘Bangladeshi’ in front of several people, and the interviews given by accused Nos. 1, 3, and 4 are prima facie defamatory.”

The case involves multiple instances of alleged defamation, including a tweet dated August 29, 2022, alleging “anti-national activities” and “illegal funds,” as well as two television shows aired on April 12, 2023, which allegedly made defamatory statements against the complainant’s institution.

The court emphasized the legal standard for summoning, stating, “The test was whether there was sufficient ground for proceeding and not whether there was sufficient ground for conviction.”

After reviewing video evidence, thumbnails, and transcripts, the court found sufficient prima facie material to proceed against all accused parties, including the news channel, its director, and its managing director.

In the order dated October 19, the judge said, "I have seen the videos, the links of which are provided by the complainant in the complaint. I have also gone through the transcripts of the interview as provided by the complainant. "From the material placed on record and the pre-summoning evidence led by the complainant, it prima facie appears that the tweet published by accused no.1, the act of accused no. 2…, and the interviews (given by three accused)… are prima facie defamatory," the judge said.

“Hence, I am satisfied that there is sufficient material to summon the accused persons under sections 500 (punishment for defamation) and 501 (printing or engraving material known to be defamatory) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Issue summons to all the accused persons…,” the judge said.

The matter has been listed for the next hearing on January 31, 2025.

Case Title: Mohd Tufail Khan v. Mufti Wajahat Qasmi & Ors.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Rahul Gandhi's Plea to Suspend Conviction in Modi Surname Defamation Case [Read Judgment] Gujarat High Court Dismisses Rahul Gandhi's Plea to Suspend Conviction in Modi Surname Defamation Case [Read Judgment]

Read about the Gujarat High Court's dismissal of Rahul Gandhi's plea to suspend his conviction in a defamation case regarding his remark on the Modi surname. The court cited pending cases and the need for purity in politics as reasons for the dismissal.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Bombay High Court Extends Interim Relief to Rahul Gandhi in Defamation Case Against PM Modi Remarks Bombay High Court Extends Interim Relief to Rahul Gandhi in Defamation Case Against PM Modi Remarks

"Bombay High Court extends interim relief to Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case related to his remarks against PM Narendra Modi. Get details of the case and the court's decision."

Bengaluru Court Orders Twitter (X Corp) to Block 'Liver Doctor' Account Amidst Defamation Lawsuit by Himalaya Wellness Company [Read Order] Bengaluru Court Orders Twitter (X Corp) to Block 'Liver Doctor' Account Amidst Defamation Lawsuit by Himalaya Wellness Company [Read Order]

Bengaluru court orders X Corp (formerly Twitter) to block 'Liver Doctor' Dr. Cyriac Abby Philips' social media account due to alleged derogatory statements against Himalaya Wellness Company. Legal action and injunction details.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

those-who-dont-believe-in-gurus-are-rascals-madras-hc-judge-sparks-row
Trending Judiciary
“Those Who Don’t Believe in Gurus Are Rascals”: Madras HC Judge Sparks Row

Madras HC Justice G.R. Swaminathan’s remarks on non-believers spark nationwide debate as impeachment motion and judicial conduct concerns resurface.

24 February, 2026 11:49 AM
ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email