38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Awards ₹8 Lakh To Puma In Trademark Infringement Suit Against Counterfeit Products [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      15 July, 2025 03:46 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Awards 8 Lakh To Puma In Trademark Infringement Suit Against Counterfeit Products

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has awarded ₹8 lakhs in favor of sportswear giant PUMA SE in a trademark infringement suit against an individual found manufacturing and selling counterfeit products bearing its registered trademark.

Justice Saurabh Banerjee passed the summary judgment on July 9, 2025, in a case that highlights the ongoing battle against counterfeiting in the sports goods industry.

The court addressed PUMA SE’s suit against defendant Himanshu Sharma, who was operating the website “www.theshoeskart.com” to sell counterfeit shoes bearing PUMA’s registered trademarks and logo.

The court noted, “The defendant herein is engaged in the business of stocking, selling, and supplying counterfeit shoes bearing the plaintiff’s trademarks, i.e., ‘PUMA’ and logo, and is also engaged in selling the counterfeiting products.”

Addressing specific concerns regarding the counterfeiting activities, the court observed, “In or around the second week of July 2021, the plaintiff received a customer complaint about the substandard quality of its shoes purchased from the defendant’s website. Subsequent investigation revealed that the products in question were counterfeit.”

The court highlighted the blatant nature of the infringement, stating, “The impugned mark of the defendant has been adopted in toto, as all essential elements of the plaintiff’s trademarks, including its logo and the formstrip device, have been replicated without any variation.”

Emphasizing the severity of counterfeiting, the court stated, “No rank counterfeiter like the defendant, who maintains a stoic silence, can be allowed to go scot-free. The plaintiff, being the registered proprietor of the trademarks, must be granted due protection and relief against such a defendant.”

The court acknowledged PUMA’s well-established trademark status, noting that its trademarks have been in continuous use since 1948 and registered in India since 1983 under Classes 25 and 18 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Significantly, PUMA’s trademark was declared a well-known mark by the Trade Marks Registry, as published in Trade Mark Journal No. 2144 dated February 19, 2024.

The defendant failed to appear or file a written statement despite proper service of summons, leading to the case being decided ex parte. The court had earlier restrained the defendant from using PUMA’s trademarks and directed the Domain Name Registrar to suspend access to the website “https://theshoeskart.com.

The court awarded ₹5,90,000 as actual costs and an additional ₹2,10,000 as damages, totaling ₹8,00,000. The defendant has been directed to make the payment within ninety days, failing which interest at 6% per annum will apply.

Mr. Ranjan Narula, Mr. Shakti Priyam Nair, and Mr. Parth Bajaj appeared as advocates for PUMA SE, while the defendant remained unrepresented throughout the proceedings.

Case Title: PUMA SE vs. Himanshu Sharma

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email