38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Issues Summons Against Club Factory to Retrain Sale of Goods with LV Mark [READ ORDER]

By Manthan Pandit      08 July, 2020 06:18 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Issues Summons Against Club Factory to Retrain Sale of Goods with LV Mark [READ ORDER]

The Delhi High Court has given summons against Chinese retailer Club Factory in a suit by luxury fashion company Louis Vuitton Malletier seeking to ban the selling of any merchandise on the websites of the former with the latters logo/trademark. (Louis Vuitton Malletier vs Future Tech India Pvt Ltd)

A single Judge Bench of Justice V Kameswar Rao has given the owner of Club Factory, Futuretimes Technology a maximum of 30 days to file his written statement in the suit.

The Club Factory app is one of 59 Chinese apps banned by the Government of India on the grounds that the apps are engaged in activities that are detrimental to India 's sovereignty and integrity, defense of India, state security and public order.

Louis Vuitton also prayed for the issuance of a temporary injunction prohibiting Club Factory or its owners, agents, distributors, etc. from the importation, manufacture, warehousing, distribution and/or offer for sale or advertisement, directly or indirectly, of any products, including facemasks, bearing the registered trademarks of Louis Vuitton.

Such trademarks include "LOUIS VUITTON," "LV" logo, Toile monogram patternDamier pattern and/or LV Flower pattern, or any similar trademark that could constitute trademark infringement.

It is prayed that the selling of these infringing goods on all Club Factory sites, including the www.clubfactory.com website, mobile applications, and social media networks, will be barred. 

Louis Vuitton has also pursued a way to suspend immediately the weblinks which advertise and/or offer the infringing products for sale.

Counsel for Club Factory stated that when the retailer is notified of the URL on which the infringing products are hosted, the retailer itself shall remove the links to the infringing products in accordance with the information technology law policy.

In the request for interim relief in the matter, the Court issued notice and ordered Club Factory to file its reply within two weeks.

The matter is expected to be heard next 13th August 2020. 

The lawyers Dhruv Anand, Udita Patro, Kavya Mammen, Sampurnaa Sanyal represented Louis Vuitton. 

Senior Advocate C.M. Lall represented Club Factory with Advocates Ankur Sangal, Ajay Bhargava, Atul Pandey, Aseem Chaturvedi, Sucheta Roy, Shiva Tokas.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email