38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 16, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Directs Bar Councils To Frame Welfare Policy For Families Of Deceased Lawyers [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      24 September, 2025 08:32 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Directs Bar Councils To Frame Welfare Policy For Families Of Deceased Lawyers

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has directed the Bar Council of India (BCI) and Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) to frame policies to alleviate the financial suffering of families of deceased lawyers, emphasizing that the families of advocates should not face “abject penury” after losing their primary breadwinner.

Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela made observations about the need for comprehensive welfare schemes for the legal fraternity and their dependents.

The court addressed a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Darshana Rani, challenging the dismissal of her claim for ₹10 lakh life insurance under the Chief Minister Advocate Welfare Scheme (CMAWS) following her son’s death.

The appellant’s case arose from a tragic timing issue, as her son, advocate Kamal Khurana, died on August 2, 2023, but the insurance policy under which he was eventually enrolled only commenced on October 20, 2023. The court observed:
“Due to the unfortunate demise of her son, late Sh. Kamal Khurana on 02.08.2023, which occurred much before the commencement of the existing insurance policy of 2023, i.e., 20.10.2023, the request of the appellant for processing the life insurance claim of ₹10 lakh under the CMAWS was rejected.”

The Single Judge had earlier dismissed the petition, noting that the deceased advocate’s credentials were verified and his name included in the insurance policy only after his death. The court stated:
“Insurance coverage is inherently contingent upon the activation of the policy, which, in this case, occurred after the unfortunate event.”

However, recognizing the appellant’s plight, the Division Bench directed the Bar Council of Delhi to explore alternative assistance. The court noted:
“The BCD has taken a proactive and benevolent step in providing financial aid to the appellant by granting monthly financial assistance for a period from 15.12.2023 to 15.12.2025, in order to mitigate the financial crisis that the appellant’s family may have found itself in.”

In a significant directive with broader implications for the legal fraternity, Justice Gedela observed:
“The BCI and BCD are further requested to draw up some Policy or Scheme to alleviate the conditions of persons such as the appellant so as to ensure the families of advocates do not suffer abject penury on account of loss of the advocate.”

The court emphasized the financial vulnerability of legal families, stating:
“After all, for most advocates and their families, the primary source of income is their professional exertions, and ordinarily they have no financial assistance in situations where the advocate unfortunately expires.”

The bench granted liberty to the appellant to approach BCI or BCD for any permissible financial assistance under existing schemes, directing the authorities to “consider the case of the appellant sympathetically.”

The Bar Council of Delhi, through its Secretary Col. Arun Sharma (Retd.), informed the court about various welfare schemes available, including the Indigent & Disabled Lawyers Committee, which had already sanctioned ₹10,000 per month for two years to the appellant starting December 15, 2023.

The court concluded by emphasizing the humanitarian aspect of legal welfare, noting that while it could not direct further assistance from BCD due to policy limitations, it hoped the broader directive would lead to meaningful reforms in advocate welfare schemes.

Mr. B.S. Bagga and Mr. Jitender Khurana, Advocates, appeared for the appellant, while Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Tanishq Srivastava, Mr. Sourabh Kumar, and Mr. Vedant Sood, Advocates, represented the Bar Council of Delhi.

Case Title: Darshana Rani vs. The Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

wangchuk-indulged-in-activities-prejudicial-to-national-security-leh-dm-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wangchuk indulged in activities prejudicial to national security, Leh DM tells SC

Leh DM tells SC Sonam Wangchuk’s NSA detention followed due process, citing activities prejudicial to national security; wife alleges surveillance in Delhi.

15 October, 2025 10:48 AM
sc-allows-use-of-green-crackers-during-diwali-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC allows use of green crackers during Diwali in Delhi NCR [Read Order]

Supreme Court permits sale and bursting of green crackers in Delhi-NCR from Oct 18–21, easing the previous Diwali ban with time and area restrictions.

15 October, 2025 12:28 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-seeks-centre-ecs-response-on-pil-for-voting-rights-to-undertrial-prisoners
Trending Judiciary
SC seeks Centre, EC's response on PIL for voting rights to undertrial prisoners

SC seeks Centre and EC’s reply on plea seeking voting rights for 4.5 lakh undertrial prisoners; petitioner says blanket ban under RPA violates constitutional norms.

10 October, 2025 02:17 PM
sex-education-must-be-from-younger-age-not-from-class-ix-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sex education must be from younger age, not from class IX: SC [Read Order]

SC stresses that sex education must begin at a younger age, not from Class IX, and be included in the school curriculum to guide children through puberty.

10 October, 2025 02:37 PM
scs-juvenile-justice-committee-to-organise-2-day-annual-consultation-on-safeguarding-girl-child
Trending Judiciary
SC's Juvenile Justice Committee to organise 2-day annual consultation on safeguarding girl child

SC’s Juvenile Justice Committee to host 2-day national consultation with UNICEF on safeguarding the girl child and strengthening child protection systems.

10 October, 2025 02:44 PM
sc-gives-centre-more-time-to-respond-to-plea-on-statehood-for-j-and-k
Trending Judiciary
SC gives Centre more time to respond to plea on statehood for J&K

SC grants Centre 4 more weeks to respond to plea seeking restoration of Jammu & Kashmir’s statehood, citing ongoing security and consultation factors.

10 October, 2025 03:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email