38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC grants bail to an accused in Ankit Sharma murder case of Delhi riots [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      03 May, 2024 06:31 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC grants bail to accused in Ankit Sharma murder case of Delhi riots

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has granted bail to one of the accused accused persons in a case relating to the killing of Intelligence Bureau (IB) staffer Ankit Sharma during the February 2020 northeast Delhi riots. With this, 3 accused persons in the Ankit Sharma murder case are now out on bail.

The Court while granting bail also held that during the pendency of the trial, bail is the rule while jail is an exception. 

Though a long period of incarceration alone may not be sufficient to grant bail to an accused in a case which is punishable with death or life imprisonment, however, it would weigh with the Court while considering a balance to be struck between the interest of the prosecution/society and the rights of the accused guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India," it stated.

It also emphasized that the issue of the credibility and reliability of witnesses presented by the prosecution should not be addressed by the Court during the stage of bail application.

However, the Court has refused to grant bail to a fourth accused, Nazim, on the grounds that crucial public witnesses were still not examined and that his release could potentially lead to interference or intimidation of said witnesses.

Further, it also noted that Nazim had a bad character, referring to nearly 12 prior FIRs against him.

FACTS

The Court was hearing a bail application filed by the accused persons in a case relating to the murder of an IB Officer Ankit Sharma who was murdered during the Northeast Delhi anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) riots in 2020.

The charges in the case were framed by the trial court in March last year against Shoaib Alam, Gulfam, Javed, Nazim, former AAP councilor Tahir Hussain, and others.

The accused were charged under Sections 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 153A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence), 302 (murder) read with 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

ARGUMENTS

Sr. Adv. Rebecca John argued that the prosecution has cited almost 114 witnesses, out of which only 11 have been examined so far. Further, they argued that the applicant cannot be made to suffer a long period of incarceration when the trial is not likely to conclude anytime soon.

Further, she also argued that there was no material on record to implicate the applicant in the murder of the deceased.

However, the Special Public Prosecutor argued that the applicant was a part of the mob and that being a member of the unlawful assembly, the applicant shared a common object and knew that the offence was likely to be committed in the prosecution of such a common object.

He further argued that in case of mass violence, delay in completion of the trial cannot be a ground to release the accused on bail.

DECISION  

The court after hearing both the parties noted that though the offence charged against the applicant was heinous and grave, and if proven, can be punishable with death or life imprisonment, even with the best efforts of the Trial Court, the trial is not likely to conclude any time soon.

The accused has already been in jail for almost 4 years. Hence, the Court granted him bail reasoning that the purpose of keeping an accused in jail during the trial is to ensure that he faces trial, does not abscond, and, if found guilty, is available to serve his sentence. The purpose is not to punish the accused.

However, the court also clarified that the observation made by it on the merits of the case was purely for the purposes of deciding the question of grant of bail and shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the matter.
 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email