38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 26, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Grants ‘Dynamic+ Injunction’ to Warner Bros. and Other Studios Against 47 Piracy Websites [Read Order]

By Samriddhi Ojha      03 January, 2026 10:24 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Grants Dynamic Injunction to Warner Bros and Other Studios Against 47 Piracy Websites

New Delhi: The High Court of Delhi has granted an ex parte ad interim injunction in favour of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and several other major global entertainment companies, directing the blocking of 47 “Infringing Websites” found to be engaging in online piracy of copyrighted works. The relief granted is a comprehensive ‘Dynamic+ injunction’, which extends protection to future and new versions of the infringing domains.

The order, issued by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia on December 18, 2025, in Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. & Ors. v. Animesugez.to & Ors., acknowledged the Plaintiffs’ position as leading global entertainment companies and owners or exclusive distributors of numerous cinematographic films and shows. The Plaintiffs submitted that the infringing websites—including domains such as animesugez.to, popcornmovies.org, and various ‘pelisflix’ and ‘cuevana’ variants—were primarily and substantially engaged in unauthorised activities, including “communicating to the public, hosting, uploading, streaming, reproducing, downloading, broadcasting, distributing and/or making available to the public the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works, without authorisation.”

After considering the submissions and documents on record, the Court observed that the infringing websites were, on a real-time basis, offering the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works for viewing and downloading without their consent or a valid licence, resulting in financial losses to the Plaintiffs.

Finding a strong case for immediate intervention, the Court held:

“The Plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case for grant of an ex parte ad interim injunction. The balance of convenience is in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the infringing websites. Irreparable injury would be caused to the Plaintiffs if an ex parte ad interim injunction is not granted. The need for immediate relief is particularly pressing in this case, as the infringing websites are making available the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works, which could lead to significant financial losses. Therefore, swift action to prevent the alleged infringements is crucial in the present case.”

The injunction restrains the 47 named websites, their owners, and all others acting on their behalf from “in any manner hosting, streaming, reproducing, distributing, making available to the public and/or communicating to the public, or facilitating the same, on their websites, the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works.”

A key element of the judgment is the imposition of a ‘Dynamic+ injunction’, designed to combat the fluid and evolving nature of online piracy. The Court noted:

“To keep up with the hydra-headed nature of the infringement actions of such infringing domains/websites, this Court finds it fit to grant a ‘Dynamic+ injunction’ to protect the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works as soon as they are created, to ensure that no irreparable loss is caused to the owners thereof, as there is an imminent possibility of the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works being uploaded on infringing websites or their newer versions immediately thereafter.”

This provision allows the Plaintiffs to implead mirror, redirect, or alphanumeric variations of the infringing websites and extend the injunction against them by filing an appropriate application.

The Court further directed Domain Name Registrars (DNRs) to lock and suspend the infringing websites within 72 hours, and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block access to the identified websites within the same timeframe. The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeITY), though formally arrayed as Defendants for the purpose of issuing blocking notifications, were exempted from the two months’ prior notice requirement under Section 80 of the CPC, considering the urgency of the relief sought.

Case Details:

Case Name: Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. & Ors. v. Animesugez.to & Ors.

Case Number: CS(COMM) 1361/2025

Court: High Court of Delhi

Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia

Date of Order: 18.12.2025

Counsel for Plaintiffs: Mr. Siddharth Chopra, Mr. Raghav Goyal, Ms. Mehr Sidhu, Mr. A. Moin & Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocates

Counsel for Defendants: Mr. Yash Raj & Ms. Geetanjali Vishwanathan, Advocates (for Defendant Nos. 48 & 56)

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

big-relief-for-sameer-wankhede-as-cat-quashes-charge-memorandum-slams-authorities-for-malafide-prosecution
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Big Relief For Sameer Wankhede As CAT Quashes Charge Memorandum, Slams Authorities For Malafide Prosecution [Read Order]

CAT quashes charge memorandum against IRS officer Sameer Wankhede, citing mala fide intent, procedural violations, and contempt of court orders.

20 January, 2026 04:59 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-refuses-to-entertain-pil-against-anjana-om-kashyap-over-valmiki-remarks-calls-it-mythology-not-history
Trending Judiciary
Punjab & Haryana HC Refuses to Entertain PIL Against Anjana Om Kashyap Over Valmiki Remarks, Calls It Mythology Not History

Punjab & Haryana High Court dismisses PIL against Anjana Om Kashyap over Valmiki remarks, holding the narrative to be mythological, not historical.

20 January, 2026 05:42 PM
patna-hc-backs-aadhaar-based-attendance-in-medical-colleges-contrasts-allahabad-hc-ruling-on-madarsa-closure
Trending Judiciary
Patna HC Backs Aadhaar-Based Attendance in Medical Colleges; Contrasts Allahabad HC Ruling on Madarsa Closure [Read Judgment]

Patna High Court upholds Aadhaar-linked facial recognition attendance for medical faculty, ruling it does not violate privacy rights under Article 21.

20 January, 2026 07:22 PM
unnao-rape-case-sengars-daughter-breaks-silence-my-father-is-not-a-rapist-exclusive
Trending Videos
Unnao Rape Case: Sengar’s Daughter Breaks Silence | “My Father Is Not a Rapist” | Exclusive

In an explosive and exclusive interview with LawStreet Journal, the daughter of Kuldeep Singh Sengar breaks her silence on the Unnao rape case, making several revelations and asserting that her father is not a rapist.

21 January, 2026 01:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email