38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Refuses Bail To Shabir Ahmed In Terror Funding Case [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      12 June, 2025 06:32 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Refuses Bail To Shabir Ahmed In Terror Funding Case

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has refused to grant bail to Kashmiri separatist leader Shabir Ahmed Shah, upholding the NIA Special Court’s earlier decision denying him bail in a terror funding case.

A Division Bench comprising Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Shalinder Kaur pronounced the verdict on June 12, 2025. The Court observed that there were “reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against the appellant appear prima facie to be true,” as required under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA).

The case arises out of an NIA investigation in RC No. 10/2017/NIA/DLI, which alleges a larger conspiracy by terrorist organisations to wage war against the Union of India by inciting unrest and violence in the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. Shah was arrested in June 2019 and later named as an accused in the second supplementary chargesheet filed in October 2019.

The prosecution alleged that Shah, founder and chairman of the Jammu and Kashmir Democratic Freedom Party (JKDFP), played a key role in the conspiracy by raising and receiving funds through hawala channels and LoC trade. These funds were allegedly used to support stone pelting, burning of schools, and violent protests against security forces.

The Court was also informed that Shah had longstanding ties with various terrorist organisations and handlers based in Pakistan. The NIA relied on statements of protected witnesses, emails allegedly sent from Pakistan-based operatives, and material seized during searches of Shah’s premises.

One such witness, code-named “John,” claimed that Shah was closely associated with stone pelters and that money received from the Pakistani establishment was distributed at his direction. The Court noted: “In cases of conspiracy, it is the evidence that gradually unfolds and unravels the entire scheme.”

Opposing the bail plea, Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Senior Advocate appearing for the NIA, submitted that the investigation had uncovered Shah’s role in secessionist planning meetings, including setting protest calendars and disbursing funds for anti-national activities.

On the other hand, Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Senior Advocate for the appellant, argued that the allegations were based on outdated speeches and recycled evidence. He submitted that the videos relied upon by the prosecution were over 25 years old and had already been used in earlier FIRs. He further argued that the videos lacked authentication under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act.

The Court, however, held that the admissibility of such material is a matter for trial and is not relevant at the bail stage. “The Court is not required to adjudicate upon the admissibility or credibility of the evidence at the stage of deciding bail,” it said.

The Bench also noted that Shah is facing prosecution in 24 other FIRs across various districts of Jammu and Kashmir, most involving similar allegations of promoting separatism and unlawful activities. While none of these cases have resulted in conviction so far, the Court observed that his long custodial history, coupled with the seriousness of charges in the present case, did not warrant the grant of bail.

Addressing the defence under freedom of speech and expression, the Bench held that while Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantees this right, it is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2). The Court observed: “The Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression, but this right does not extend to inciting violence, promoting enmity, or waging war against the State. When such expressions threaten the unity and integrity of the nation, they lose constitutional protection.”

Rejecting Shah’s alternative prayer for house arrest, the Court observed: “Considering the gravity and sensitivity of the allegations, and the fact that protected witnesses are yet to be examined, it would not be appropriate to release the appellant even on house arrest.”

The Bench emphasized that the prosecution had presented prima facie material linking Shah to secessionist activities, and reiterated the settled principle that courts, at the bail stage, are not expected to assess the credibility of evidence.

Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Senior Advocate, appeared for the appellant Shabir Ahmed Shah, assisted by Mr. Kamran Khwaja, Advocate. Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Senior Advocate, appeared for the National Investigation Agency (NIA), along with Mr. Akshai Malik, Special Public Prosecutor, and Mr. Ayush Agarwal, Mr. Khawar Saleem, and Mr. K.P. Rustom Khan, Advocates.

Case Title: Shabir Ahmed Shah v. National Investigation Agency

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM
limitation-for-continuous-breach-runs-only-till-contract-expiry-kerala-hc-clarifies
Trending Judiciary
Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.

30 October, 2025 01:37 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM
ngt-orders-probe-into-illegal-tree-felling-in-delhis-civil-lines-directs-action-within-three-months
Trending Environment
NGT Orders Probe into Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines, Directs Action Within Three Months [Read Order]

NGT directs Tree Officer to probe illegal tree felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines and take action under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.

25 October, 2025 11:28 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-fir-against-cnn-news18-anchor-akansha-swarup-over-kamakhya-temple-remarks
Trending CelebStreet
Gauhati HC Quashes FIR Against CNN-News18 Anchor Akansha Swarup Over Kamakhya Temple Remarks [Read Order]

Gauhati HC quashes FIR against CNN-News18 anchor Akansha Swarup, ruling her Kamakhya Temple remarks were careless but lacked malicious intent.

25 October, 2025 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-upholds-divorce-on-cruelty-grounds-denies-alimony-to-financially-independent-wife
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Divorce On Cruelty Grounds, Denies Alimony To Financially Independent Wife [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds divorce on cruelty grounds, denies alimony to IRTS officer wife, ruling that alimony is for need-based justice, not enrichment.

25 October, 2025 12:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email