38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, January 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Delhi Riots Accused Shahrukh Pathan who was Accused of Firing Shots at Head Constable [READ JUDGMENT]

By Shreyas Nair      16 April, 2021 07:03 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Delhi Riots Accused Shahrukh Pathan

Shahrukh Pathan, who was said to have opened fire on police officers during the anti-CAA Delhi riots violence in February 2020, had his bail application rejected on (April 15, 2021) by the Delhi High Court. During the anti-CAA violence that shook Delhi, Pathan was seen brandishing a gun and firing it.

The Delhi riots suspect was denied bail on (April 15, 2021) by a single judge bench of Justice Suresh Kait of the Delhi High Court. Pathan Khan is accused of firing shots at a Delhi Police Head Constable in Jaffarabad during the Delhi Riots 2020 violence.

"The video clipping and pictures played before this Court have shaken the conscience of this Court how petitioner could take law and order in his hands," the court said, citing the police video footage as evidence. 

It went on to say that, regardless of whether he intended to kill the complainant or someone else in the crowd with his open-air gunshots, it was "difficult to imagine that he had no idea that his behaviour could hurt anyone present at the scene." 

"It is not the case of the petitioner that he was not involved in the alleged incident," the bench added, referring to the details of the case and Pathan's defence.                     

Pathan was denied interim bail by the Karkardooma Court (Delhi) in November after videos of him firing shots at a police officer during the February 2020 Delhi Riots went viral on social media and the internet. 

"The learned trial court has correctly held that the petitioner is supposed to have engaged in riots, and his image speaks volumes of his participation," Justice Kait said.

The court also stated that the complainant's argument was worthy of being recorded under Section 161 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr. P.C.') titled Examination of witnesses by police provides for oral examination of a person by any investigating officer when such person is supposed to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case. 

Pathan's argument that he "had not pointed the gun at the defendant" would be put to the test at trial. Pathan's temporary bail request has previously been denied by Additional Sessions, Judge Amitabh Rawat. Last year in 2020, Pathan was found brandishing a gun with the intention of shooting it and aiming it at police officer Head Constable Deepak Dahiya, who was assigned to law-and-order duties near Jaffarabad Metro Station on that day.

The instant case against Pathan was registered under section 147 IPC- Punishment for rioting that is whoever is guilty of rioting, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. Imprisonment for 2 years, or fine, or both, section 148 IPC - Rioting, armed with a deadly weapon, section 149 IPC - Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in the prosecution of a common object, Sections 216, 307, 353 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) also read with Section 25 & 27 Arms Act were applied. 

After the said incident near Jaffarabad Metro Station, he had absconded, however, he was arrested by the team of Delhi Police Crime Branch on Mar 3, 2020, from the Shamli Bus Stand, Uttar Pradesh based on secret information.

[Shahrukh Pathan alias Khan v The State of NCT of Delhi (Bail App 664/2021)]

[READ JUDGMENT]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ai-judges-the-future-of-algorithmic-decision-making-in-courts
Trending Vantage Points
“AI Judges” The Future of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Courts

Can algorithms deliver justice? This article explores AI judges, constitutional challenges, ethical risks, global models, and India’s cautious path forward.

12 January, 2026 07:07 PM

TOP STORIES

borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM
leela-palace-udaipur-ordered-to-pay-10-lakh-after-housekeeping-staff-enters-occupied-room-without-consent
Trending Business
Leela Palace Udaipur Ordered to Pay ₹10 Lakh After Housekeeping Staff Enters Occupied Room Without Consent [Read Order]

Chennai Consumer Commission orders Leela Palace Udaipur to pay ₹10 lakh and refund room tariff for breach of guest privacy by housekeeping staff.

07 January, 2026 09:43 PM
sc-strikes-down-bihars-midway-change-in-recruitment-rules-for-assistant-engineers
Trending Judiciary
SC Strikes Down Bihar’s Midway Change in Recruitment Rules for Assistant Engineers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules recruitment criteria cannot be changed midway, strikes down Bihar’s retrospective amendment granting weightage to contractual engineers.

07 January, 2026 10:03 PM
only-light-and-not-any-fight-madras-hc-upholds-single-judges-order-allowing-lighting-of-lamps-on-deepathoon
Trending Judiciary
Only Light And Not Any Fight: Madras HC Upholds Single Judge’s Order Allowing Lighting Of Lamps On Deepathoon [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court upholds order allowing lighting of Karthigai Deepam at Deepathoon, rejecting public order objections and dismissing 20 appeals.

07 January, 2026 10:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email