38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Suspends Life Sentence Of Woman Convicted In Murder Case, Cites 11 Years Incarceration And Plight Of Minor Children [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      28 October, 2025 03:00 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Suspends Life Sentence Of Woman Convicted In Murder Case Cites 11 Years Incarceration And Plight Of Minor Children

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has suspended the life sentence of a woman convicted of murder, taking into account her prolonged incarceration, satisfactory conduct in jail, and the welfare of her three minor children, including a two-year-old currently living with her in prison.

The Division Bench comprising Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Manoj Jain passed the order in Crl.A. 941/2024 (Rajia @ Sabbo vs. State of NCT of Delhi) while hearing her plea for suspension of sentence pending appeal. The appellant had been convicted along with her husband, Jamir, for the brutal murder of one Saleem in 2011. Both were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B IPC.

According to the prosecution, Saleem, the deceased, had been missing since June 17, 2011. His dismembered body was later recovered from two separate locations in Ghaziabad, packed in plastic bags. The investigation suggested that Jamir suspected his wife, Rajia @ Sabbo, of having an illicit relationship with Saleem and that both accused conspired to kill him. Acting on their disclosure, the police recovered the remains of the deceased and the alleged weapons of offence — a gandasa and two knives — from a co-accused’s house.

During the hearing, counsel for the appellant argued that there was no direct evidence linking her to the act of murder. The case, he contended, rested entirely on circumstantial evidence and speculative motive. He further pointed out that no recovery was made from the appellant’s possession and that her conduct in jail had been exemplary; she worked as a Crèche Sahayak and supported her children and aged parents.

The Court observed that although the alleged motive for the crime was an illicit relationship between the deceased and the appellant, such a claim did not appear credible. “If there was any such illicit relationship, it is not comprehensible as to why the appellant herein would kill him,” the Bench noted, adding that the alleged motive did not seem forceful enough to sustain the inference of guilt.

The Bench also took into consideration her gender and family circumstances. “We are concerned about the fact that the appellant is a lady and that her one child, who is barely two years old, is with her in the prison,” the order read. It further observed that her other two children were under the care of her aged parents, both in their nineties, who were unable to look after them properly.

The Court emphasized that while the offence was serious, continued incarceration of the appellant, who had already spent over ten years and nine months in custody, would serve little purpose, especially when her appeal was unlikely to be heard in the near future.

Accordingly, the Bench suspended her sentence on furnishing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety in the like sum, directing her not to leave the country or contact the family of the deceased. The Court clarified that the observations made in the order were limited to the consideration of the bail plea and would not affect the merits of the appeal.

Appearance:
Mr. Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Ms. Prachi Nirwan, Mr. Ishat Singh Bhati, and Mr. Gaurav Chahal appeared for the appellant. Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP, along with Mr. Akhilesh Tiwari, Ms. Divya Yadav, and Mr. Lalit Luthra appeared for the State, assisted by SI Anil from PS Seema Puri.

Case Title: Rajia @ Sabbo vs. State of NCT of Delhi

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email