38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Solicitor General On Plea For FIR On Hate Speech, "Situation Not Conducive"; Delhi High Court Adjourns Case Until April 13, 2020

By LawStreet News Network      29 February, 2020 06:02 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Adjourns Case On Hate Speech

The Delhi High Court division bench comprising of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar on 27th February 2020 has adjourned the hearing of the petition filed by activist Harsh Mander. The petition sought the enquiry into the recent Delhi riots and had further asked for actions to be taken against the politicians who have been alleged to have incited the violence. 

The case has been adjourned till 13th April, 2020. 

The submissions on behalf of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta were accepted. He had contended that the situation was not "conducive" for registration of FIR, further to which the Court has granted three weeks-time to Union of India for filing a counter affidavit in the case. The affidavit submitted by SG stated the Delhi police's decision to defer from taking a decision on the plea for FIRs. 

"SG had submitted before the court that the union is seized of the matter. Further, it was submitted that police has gone through all the videos and needs more time to take appropriate action as the situation is not conducive today. Rahul Mehra, standing Counsel Delhi Government informed the court that till now 48 FIRs have been registered. In light of these developments, Union of India is granted 3 weeks to file a counter affidavit," the Court noted in the order. 

Senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, contended, "The bench did not heed to this and proceeded to fix the next date of hearing as April 13th," he put forth the statement after arguing that 10-12 people were dying every day. 

On 26th February 2020, a division bench comprising of Justices S Muralidhar and Talwant Singh had directed the Delhi Police Commissioner to take "conscious decision" by 27th February 2020 in respect to the registration of FIR against the speeches made by the politicians. 

The SG's similar submission on 26th February was dismissed by Justice Muralidhar by asking, "What's the appropriate time, Mr. Mehta? The city is burning."

The SG who appeared for the Delhi Police on 27th February 2020 submitted that the petitioner was "selectively" seeking action against few speeches attributed to BJP leaders. 

The petition had been originally listed for hearing on 26th February, 2020 before the bench headed by CJ Patel. 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email